2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.01596
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Mobile Apps for Child Sexual Abuse Education: Limitations and Design Guidelines

Sadia Tasnuva Pritha,
Rahnuma Tasnim,
Muhammad Ashad Kabir
et al.

Abstract: With the availability of many child sexual abuse (CSA) education apps in different app stores, the demand for an evaluation system has become necessary as little information regarding their evidence-based quality is available.The objectives of this study are understanding the requirements of a CSA education app, identifying the limitations of existing apps, and providing a guideline for better app design. An electronic search across three major app stores (Google Play, Apple, and Microsoft) is conducted and th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reviewed research on software quality aspects such as usability, reliability, functionality, and efficiency (Koepp et al, 2020;Poon & Friesen, 2015;Friesen et al, 2013;Vos-Draper, 2013). Our goal was to build a rating tool by adopting and extending the existing rating tools such as the mobile application rating scale (MARS) (Stoyanov et al, 2015), uMARS -end-user version of MARS (Stoyanov et al, 2016), FinMARS -MARS for financial apps (Huebner et al, 2019), a mobile app rating tool for foot measurement (Kabir et al, 2021), and a mobile app rating tool for child sexual abuse education (Pritha et al, 2021). Our developed rating tool adopts the relevant evaluation features suited for analyzing food consumption tracking and recommendations.…”
Section: App Rating Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed research on software quality aspects such as usability, reliability, functionality, and efficiency (Koepp et al, 2020;Poon & Friesen, 2015;Friesen et al, 2013;Vos-Draper, 2013). Our goal was to build a rating tool by adopting and extending the existing rating tools such as the mobile application rating scale (MARS) (Stoyanov et al, 2015), uMARS -end-user version of MARS (Stoyanov et al, 2016), FinMARS -MARS for financial apps (Huebner et al, 2019), a mobile app rating tool for foot measurement (Kabir et al, 2021), and a mobile app rating tool for child sexual abuse education (Pritha et al, 2021). Our developed rating tool adopts the relevant evaluation features suited for analyzing food consumption tracking and recommendations.…”
Section: App Rating Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%