A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cost Typology

Abstract

Background There is a need for easily accessible tuberculosis unit cost data, as well as an understanding of the variability of methods used and reporting standards of that data. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to descriptively review papers reporting tuberculosis unit costs from a healthcare provider perspective looking at methodological variation; to assess quality using a study quality rating system and machine learning to investigate the indicators of reporting quality; and to identify the data gaps to inform standardised tuberculosis unit cost collection and consistent principles for reporting going forward. Methods We searched grey and published literature in five sources and eight databases, respectively, using search terms linked to cost, tuberculosis and tuberculosis health services including tuberculosis treatment and prevention. For inclusion, the papers needed to contain empirical unit cost estimates for tuberculosis interventions from low-and middle-income countries, with reference years between 1990 and 2018. A total of 21,691 papers were found and screened in a phased manner. Data were extracted from the eligible papers into a detailed Microsoft Excel tool, extensively cleaned and analysed with R software (R Project, Vienna, Austria) using the user interface of RStudio. A study quality rating was applied to the reviewed papers based on the inclusion or omission of a selection of variables and their relative importance. Following this, machine learning using a recursive partitioning method was utilised to construct a classification tree to assess the reporting quality. Results This systematic review included 103 provider perspective papers with 627 unit costs (costs not presented here) for tuberculosis interventions among a total of 140 variables. The interventions covered were active, passive and intensified case finding; tuberculosis treatment; above-service costs; and tuberculosis prevention. Passive case finding is the detection of tuberculosis cases where individuals self-identify at health facilities; active case finding is detection of cases of those not in health facilities, such as through outreach; and intensified case finding is detection of cases in high-risk populations. There was heterogeneity in some of the reported methods used such cost allocation, amortisation and the use of top-down, bottom-up or mixed approaches to the costing. Uncertainty checking through sensitivity analysis was only reported on by half of the papers (54%), while purposive and convenience sampling was reported by 72% of papers. Machine learning indicated that reporting on 'Intervention' (in particular), 'Urbanicity' and 'Site Sampling', were the most likely indicators of quality of reporting. The largest data gap identified was for tuberculosis vaccination cost data, the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine in particular. There is a gap in available unit costs for 12 of 30 high tuberculosis burden countries, as well as for the interventions of above-service costs, tuberculosis prevention, and ...

Visual impairments among immigrants living in Northeast Turkey and their ocular finding differences compared to the local population

“…Although a routine vaccination program exists in almost all countries regarding TB, these individuals with low socioeconomic status could have difficulties in accessing the vaccination program, and many do not know whether Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination has been administered. [17][18][19][20] Blepharitis is one of the most common infestations in routine ophthalmology practice, and in our study, this situation was higher in immigrant individuals than in the local population.Among the patients in the study, the rates of glaucoma, ARMD and diabetic retinopathy were higher in patients in the local population than in immigrant patients. While Table 1.…”

Effect of implementing digital adherence technologies on the use of health care providers’ time and the human resource cost of tuberculosis treatment adherence support in Ethiopia

“…We used an ingredient costing approach to estimate the provider costs of human resources, training and supporting the tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention in the sample of 15 of the 78 health facilities participating in the trial [9]. The time spent by health workers recorded on the timeand-motion studies, were valued using the staff grade and associated salaries of the tuberculosis focal person (one nurse) at each of the health facilities.…”

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of decentralising childhood tuberculosis diagnosis: a mathematical modelling study in six high tuberculosis incidence countries

“…Cost data collection tools were adapted from the Value TB costing tool suite developed in conjunction with the Global Health Cost Consortium (GHCC), with reference to the GHCC/WHO guidance 'Costing Guidelines for Tuberculosis Interventions'. 13 Labour costs were sourced from national pay scales and project accounts, medications from the Stop TB partnership Global Drug Facility catalogue, 14 consumables including materials for diagnostic tests, staff training, and equipment from project accounts, and hospitalisation cost of an inpatient bed day from the WHO-CHOICE unit cost estimates for service delivery. 15 As this intervention did not change facility infrastructure, we excluded facility-associated overhead costs from the analysis.…”