2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291706007951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of longitudinal outcome studies of first-episode psychosis

Abstract: Outcome from FEP may be more favorable than previously reported, and treatment and methodological variables may be important contributors to outcome. Significant heterogeneity in definitions and methodology limited the comparison and pooling of data. A multi-dimensional, globally used definition of outcome is required for future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
237
1
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(43 reference statements)
7
237
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings also support the hypothesis that social disability occurs after the onset of psychosis (Menezes et al, 2006), with individuals in the FEP and delayed recovery groups spending significantly less time in structured activity than the ARMS and non-clinical groups.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings also support the hypothesis that social disability occurs after the onset of psychosis (Menezes et al, 2006), with individuals in the FEP and delayed recovery groups spending significantly less time in structured activity than the ARMS and non-clinical groups.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Social disability is also prevalent in the recovery phase, after the remission of psychotic symptoms (Menezes et al, 2006). This is hypothesised to result from the impact of psychosis on social networks and self-esteem (Gureje et al, 2004).…”
Section: Social Functioning and Psychosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial proportion of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia display unfavourable outcomes in domains such as community involvement, work and independent living (Menezes et al, 2006). The positive symptoms of schizophrenia specifically hallucinations and delusions -account for a negligible proportion of the variance in such functional outcomes in clinically stable samples (Ventura et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies failed to find any association between outcome and the above-mentioned factors [7,13], making their clinical usefulness very poor. The reasons for these discrepancies could be numerous: firstly, the sample selections are quite different among studies, varying from very strictly criteria to observational studies; secondly, several clinical variables that could modify the antipsychotic response are often not properly take into account or not adequately assessed (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, predictors of poor outcome include a family history of schizophrenia [8], poor premorbid functioning [6,9,10], lack of insight [6,9], severe negative symptoms [4], a long duration of untreated psychosis [11] and substance misuse [12]. Nonetheless, the prognostic value of these variables remains unclear since several studies failed to find any association between outcome and the above-mentioned factors [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%