The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.20897/jisem.201717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Literature Reporting on Studies Analysing Technologies for Ageing in Place to Support Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract: The present article reports a systematic review of reviews and meta-analysis whose main objective was to systematize current evidence of technologies for ageing in place designed to support the daily living of community-dwelling older adults. The broad analysis of the study reported in the present article is useful to inform older adults, practitioners and researchers about the state of the art of technologies for ageing in place. A total of 24 reviews and meta-analysis were retrieved. These studies analyse th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When studying the valency properties of a verb, the basis is the consideration of its lexical semantics (both a single verb and the semantic type or categorical semantic class to which it refers). In its most general form, the valency of a verb depends on its belonging to these semantic classifications characterized by a field structure (Ouhpar et al, 2019;Queirós et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When studying the valency properties of a verb, the basis is the consideration of its lexical semantics (both a single verb and the semantic type or categorical semantic class to which it refers). In its most general form, the valency of a verb depends on its belonging to these semantic classifications characterized by a field structure (Ouhpar et al, 2019;Queirós et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%