A Systematic Review of Jailed Balloon Technique for Coronary Bifurcation Lesion: Conventional-Jailed Balloon Technique vs Modified-Jailed Balloon Technique

Tondas, Alexander Edo; Mulawarman, Rido; Trifitriana, Monica; Pranata, Raymond; Abisha, Savero Evan; Toruan, Mangiring P.L.

doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.001

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a comparative, randomized superiority trial (Tables 2 [ 18 - 27 ] and 3 [ 14 , 28 - 33 ]) published in 2020, Kumsars et al [ 28 ] enrolled 450 patients to study whether a simple stenting or complex stenting approach improved outcomes for patients. The primary endpoint of the trial was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 months and after a follow-up of two years.…”

Section: A Comparison Of Stenting Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite these changes, there were no differences between other primary or secondary endpoints. A separate systematic review by Tondas et al evaluates modified-JBT (m-JBT) broadly, including BSKT, against the conventional JBT [ 27 ]. They confirmed the findings of Jin et al , describing how the m-JBT technique has fewer instances of side branch loss, dissection, and MACE.…”

Section: A Comparison Of Stenting Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

Aedma

Naik

Kanmanthareddy

2023

CCR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Given the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes, but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economical argument as well as a patient-outcome one. Objective: Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objectively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. Methods: We perform a review of the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. Results: In this review, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding, and chart where the field is heading. Conclusion: Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.

show abstract

Section: A Comparison Of Stenting Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Comparison Of Stenting Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

Aedma

Naik

Kanmanthareddy

2023

CCR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All three JBTs, the jailed semi-inflated balloon technique and the M-JBT were investigated in small-sized trials and found to have low SB loss, SB dissection and MACE rates[ 66 , 67 ]; however, larger randomized controlled trials are required for the routine use of these new techniques in the PST.…”

Section: Pstmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fundamentals of percutaneous coronary bifurcation interventions

Kırat¹

2022

WJC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) account for 15%-20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions. The complex nature of these lesions is responsible for poorer procedural, early and late outcomes. This complex lesion subset has received great attention in the interventional cardiac community, and multiple stenting techniques have been developed. Of these, the provisional stenting technique is most often the default strategy; however, the elective double stenting (EDS) technique is preferred in certain subsets of complex CBLs. The double kissing crush technique may be the preferred EDS technique because of its efficacy and safety in comparative trials; however, this technique consists of many steps and requires training. Many new methods have recently been added to the EDS techniques to provide better stent scaffolding and to reduce early and late adverse outcomes. Intravascular imaging is necessary to determine the interventional strategy and postinterventional results. This review discusses the basic concepts, contemporary percutaneous interventional technical approaches, new methods, and controversial treatment issues of CBLs.

show abstract

Predicting Side Branch Occlusion and Techniques for Protecting Side Branches

Okada

Hibi

2023

Basics of Comprehensive IVUS-Guided PCI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Systematic Review of Jailed Balloon Technique for Coronary Bifurcation Lesion: Conventional-Jailed Balloon Technique vs Modified-Jailed Balloon Technique

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence

Fundamentals of percutaneous coronary bifurcation interventions

Predicting Side Branch Occlusion and Techniques for Protecting Side Branches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About