A Systematic Review of Interventions That Integrate Perinatal Mental Health Care Into Routine Maternal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Abstract

BackgroundWomen in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionally affected by perinatal depression and anxiety and lack access to mental health care. Integrating perinatal mental health care into routine maternal care is recommended to address gaps in access to mental health care in such under-resourced settings. Understanding the effectiveness of interventions that integrate perinatal mental health care into routine maternal care in LMICs is critical to inform ongoing intervention development, implementation, and scale-up. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of interventions that integrate perinatal mental health care into routine maternal care to improve maternal mental health and infant health outcomes in LMICs.MethodIn accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search was conducted seeking publications of controlled trials examining interventions that aimed to integrate perinatal mental health care into routine maternal care in LMICs. Abstracts and full text articles were independently reviewed by two authors for inclusion utilizing Covidence Review Software. Data was extracted and narrative synthesis was conducted.FindingsTwenty studies met eligibility criteria from the initial search results of 2,382 unique citations. There was substantial heterogeneity between the study samples, intervention designs, and outcome assessments. Less than half of the studies focused on women with active depression or anxiety. Most studies (85%) implemented single intervention designs involving psychological, psychosocial, psychoeducational, or adjuvant emotion/stress management. There were few interventions utilizing multicomponent approaches, pharmacotherapy, or referral to mental health specialists. Outcome measures and assessment timing were highly variable. Eighteen studies demonstrated significantly greater improvement on depression and/or anxiety measures in the intervention group(s) as compared to control.ConclusionIntegrated interventions can be effective in LMICs. The findings provide a critical understanding of current interventions design gaps. This includes the lack of comprehensive intervention designs that incorporate increasing intensity of treatment for more severe illness, pharmacotherapy, mental health specialist referrals, and non-mental health professional training and supervision. The findings also provide strategies to overcome design and implementation barriers in LMICs. Study findings provide a foundation for future evidence-based adaptation, implementation, and scale-up of interventions that integrate perinatal mental health care into routine maternal care in LMICs.Systematic Review Registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_ record.php?ID=CRD42021259092], identifier [CRD42021259092].

Task-sharing psychosocial interventions for the prevention of common mental disorders in the perinatal period in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…The majority of studies included in this review were conducted in East Asia and Pacific Area Countries, and in the Middle East. Consistently with the recent literature (Chalise et al, 2022; Prom et al, 2022; Simkhada & van Teijlingen, 2018), our results highlight an imbalance in the geographical distribution of research outputs. The identified gap may help to orient the research agenda for the next years, in order to prioritize critical geographical areas that are still neglected.…”

A realist review of interventions targeting maternal health in low- and middle-income countries

“…After deduplication and eligibility screening, 44 papers were included for the study (see Figure 1) which included 947 relevant primary studies. 23 –66 Details and characteristics of all the included studies are described in Supplementary file 2 (Table 1). Reviews included a wide range of interventions targeted to improve maternal care and health across LMICs.…”

Non-specialist-delivered psychosocial intervention for prenatal anxiety in a tertiary care setting in Pakistan: a qualitative process evaluation

“…Systematic reviews of qualitative studies from LMICs have indicated high levels of acceptance of CBT-based maternal mental health interventions 2 27. However, for non-specialist-delivered interventions to be successful, effective training and supervision structures are essential 14 28. In our trial, before NSPs delivered the intervention to mothers with prenatal anxiety, they received 42 hours of classroom instruction followed by supervised field training and weekly ongoing supervision by mental health specialists 19.…”