A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services

Abstract

BackgroundIn the UK there are almost three times as many beds in care homes as in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Care homes rely on primary health care for access to medical care and specialist services. Repeated policy documents and government reviews register concern about how health care works with independent providers, and the need to increase the equity, continuity and quality of medical care for care homes. Despite multiple initiatives, it is not known if some approaches to service delivery are more effective in promoting integrated working between the NHS and care homes. This study aims to evaluate the different integrated approaches to health care services supporting older people in care homes, and identify barriers and facilitators to integrated working.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using Medline (PubMed), CINAHL, BNI, EMBASE, PsycInfo, DH Data, Kings Fund, Web of Science (WoS incl. SCI, SSCI, HCI) and the Cochrane Library incl. DARE. Studies were included if they evaluated the effectiveness of integrated working between primary health care professionals and care homes, or identified barriers and facilitators to integrated working. Studies were quality assessed; data was extracted on health, service use, cost and process related outcomes. A modified narrative synthesis approach was used to compare and contrast integration using the principles of framework analysis.ResultsSeventeen studies were included; 10 quantitative studies, two process evaluations, one mixed methods study and four qualitative. The majority were carried out in nursing homes. They were characterised by heterogeneity of topic, interventions, methodology and outcomes. Most quantitative studies reported limited effects of the intervention; there was insufficient information to evaluate cost. Facilitators to integrated working included care home managers' support and protected time for staff training. Studies with the potential for integrated working were longer in duration.ConclusionsDespite evidence about what inhibits and facilitates integrated working there was limited evidence about what the outcomes of different approaches to integrated care between health service and care homes might be. The majority of studies only achieved integrated working at the patient level of care and the focus on health service defined problems and outcome measures did not incorporate the priorities of residents or acknowledge the skills of care home staff. There is a need for more research to understand how integrated working is achieved and to test the effect of different approaches on cost, staff satisfaction and resident outcomes.

Cross-sector Service Provision in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review

“…Funding can be challenging to navigate when sectors retain most or all of their independence from one another [4212527]. In cross-sector service provision arrangements where the programme is jointly funded, this issue appears to be reduced [21].…”

Perspectives on Mealtime Management in Residential Aged Care: Insights From a Cross-Disciplinary Investigation

“…Perspectives of both facility staff and speech-language pathologists confirm there are ongoing issues with multidisciplinary care in residential aged care settings (17,32) with a work environment that fosters open and equal communication and mutual respect across staffing levels and in decision making yet to be achieved. Poor role description, disparity between responsibility for mealtime management, and hands-on mealtime assistance, as well as difficulty communicating recommendations and concerns about residents across facility staffing levels and between facility staff and speech-language pathologists were areas raised as being of particular concern in this study.…”

Changing practice in dementia care in the community: developing and testing evidence-based interventions, from timely diagnosis to end of life (EVIDEM)

“…[243][244][245] Care home notes from which resident baseline characteristics were extracted could be inconsistent across time points. Residents' long-term conditions are likely to be under-reported as a result.…”