2020
DOI: 10.1111/dme.14495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of illness perception interventions in type 2 diabetes: Effects on glycaemic control and illness perceptions

Abstract: Aims This systematic review sought to synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of illness perception interventions compared with control conditions at changing illness perceptions and improving glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Methods Seven electronic databases were searched between October 2018 and May 2020. Randomized controlled trials that tested interventions informed by the Common‐Sense Model in adults with type 2 diabetes, and measured illness perceptions and glycaemic co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be explained by the fact that China is so huge, and different regions have different cultures and contexts. However, the present study indicated that the Leventhal's common‐sense model can explain Chinese patients' thoughts and reflections in their attempt to cope with a health condition such as diabetes and provided suggestions for future interventions in Chinese patients with T2DM (Alyami et al, 2020; McAndrew et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be explained by the fact that China is so huge, and different regions have different cultures and contexts. However, the present study indicated that the Leventhal's common‐sense model can explain Chinese patients' thoughts and reflections in their attempt to cope with a health condition such as diabetes and provided suggestions for future interventions in Chinese patients with T2DM (Alyami et al, 2020; McAndrew et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Health‐care providers may develop appropriate interventions to increase patients' treatment control, illness coherence and timeline (acute/chronic) to engage them in their own care. Involving family members in the interventions may enhance the intervention effect (Alyami et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illness perception has successfully predicted behaviours and outcomes across populations including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, anxiety, depression, cancer and medication adherence ( Foxwell et al, 2013 , Broadbent et al, 2015 , Alyami et al, 2021 , Anakwa et al, 2021 ). In recent times, studies have explored illness perception and adherence to safety protocols for COVID-19 and observed that perceptions toward COVID-19 had significant impact on adherence to these measures ( Chong et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a lack of illness understanding among patients is not uncommon in clinical practice: two previous studies in a clinical setting found that only 42% and 77% of the patients were able to list their diagnosis and that 14% and 17% of the patients were able to state the common side effects of their medication (30,31). Such findings have shown adequate room to modify negative illness perceptions, which are indeed modifiable according to existing evidence in other patient groups and the CSM (6,(32)(33)(34)(35). Current interventions to improve illness perceptions are mainly derived from the CSM framework and usually involve behaviour change techniques to modify the psychosocial determinants of unwanted (e.g., nonadherent) behaviour, such as patient education, motivational interviewing, goal setting, identifying and solving problems, improving social support, and facilitating support seeking (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%