A systematic review of health state utility values and psychometric performance of generic preference-based instruments for children and adolescents with mental health problems

Abstract

Aims This paper aims to systematically identify reported health state utility values (HSUVs) in children and adolescents with mental health problems (MHPs) aged less than 25 years; to summarise the techniques used to elicit HSUVs; and to examine the psychometric performance of the identified multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) used in this space. Methods A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published in English, reporting HSUVs for children and adolescents with MHPs using direct or indirect valuation methods were searched in six databases. Results We found 38 studies reporting HSUVs for 12 types of MHPs across 12 countries between 2005 and October 2021. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and depression are the most explored MHPs. Disruptive Behaviour Disorder was associated with the lowest reported HSUVs of 0.06 while cannabis use disorder was associated with the highest HSUVs of 0.88. Indirect valuation method through the use of MAUIs (95% of included studies) was the most frequently used approach, while direct valuation methods (Standard Gamble, Time Trade-Off) were only used to derive HSUVs in ADHD. This review found limited evidence of the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. Conclusion This review provides an overview of HSUVs of various MHPs, the current practice to generate HSUVs, and the psychometric performance of MAUIs used in children and adolescents with MHPs. It highlights the need for more rigorous and extensive psychometric assessments to produce evidence on the suitability of MAUIs used in this area.

Dissonance, Disagreement, Difference: Challenging Thematic Consensus to Decolonise Grounded Theory

“…The epistemological and ontological underpinnings of each is a key contributor to their essential difference. First Nations scholars have been important contributors to Indigenous mental health research and policy development, working within Western quantitative and qualitative research methodologies (see Dudgeon et al, 2022;Gone, 2023;McGaw et al, 2022a;Milroy et al, 2023;Thai et al, 2023;Vance et al, 2017). The reasons for the use of Western methodologies and development of hybrid frameworks are twofold.…”