2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Electronic Community Resource Referral Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of treating patients extends beyond their time in the hospital, and eSource technology may need to capture data from their experiences in community health care and social care settings. Stakeholders, such as community health care providers, social workers, and caregivers, play important roles in these contexts [ 36 , 38 ]. Recognizing their involvement and understanding their perspectives is crucial for comprehensively addressing the challenges and potential solutions associated with eSource technology implementation in RWSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process of treating patients extends beyond their time in the hospital, and eSource technology may need to capture data from their experiences in community health care and social care settings. Stakeholders, such as community health care providers, social workers, and caregivers, play important roles in these contexts [ 36 , 38 ]. Recognizing their involvement and understanding their perspectives is crucial for comprehensively addressing the challenges and potential solutions associated with eSource technology implementation in RWSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of treating patients extends beyond their time in the hospital, and eSource technology may need to capture data from their experiences in community health care and social care settings. Stakeholders, such as community health care providers, social workers, and caregivers, play important roles in these contexts [36,38].…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%