2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.28.20183475
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Droplet and Aerosol Generation in Dentistry

Abstract: Introduction: Against the COVID-19 pandemic backdrop and potential disease transmission risk by dental procedures that can generate aerosol and droplets. Objectives: This review aimed to identify which clinical dental procedures do generate droplets and aerosols with subsequent contamination, and for these, characterise their pattern, spread and settle. Materials and Method: Six databases were searched and citation chasing undertaken (to 11/08/20). Screening stages were undertaken in duplicate, independently, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart, 33 detailing the number of studies through each stage of the larger review process, is available as a pre-print online. 23 Papers across all procedures (n = 193) were obtained for full-text screening. Papers, eligible for inclusion, were categorised by the procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart, 33 detailing the number of studies through each stage of the larger review process, is available as a pre-print online. 23 Papers across all procedures (n = 193) were obtained for full-text screening. Papers, eligible for inclusion, were categorised by the procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key data items were extracted using a standardised data extraction form developed a priori and refined based on repeat pilot testing with a minimum of five publications and three data extractors. The data extracted for the overall study are presented in a table available at medRixiv, 23 including study overview; dental procedures investigated; methodology; and relevant findings (related to the review outcomes). Detection methods for contamination were categorised as microbial, blood and other (non-microbial/non-blood).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations