2022
DOI: 10.12659/msm.937470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies Conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Levels of Dental Anxiety Between Genders and Demographic Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did not come across a study in which the education levels of parents were evaluated separately in our literature review, in many studies evaluating the anxiety levels of children according to the education level of the family, it was shown that as the education level of the parents increased, the anxiety level of the children decreased and the anxiety coping skills of these children were better (21)(22)(23). In addition, there are studies in which a relationship could not be determined between parental education levels (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although we did not come across a study in which the education levels of parents were evaluated separately in our literature review, in many studies evaluating the anxiety levels of children according to the education level of the family, it was shown that as the education level of the parents increased, the anxiety level of the children decreased and the anxiety coping skills of these children were better (21)(22)(23). In addition, there are studies in which a relationship could not be determined between parental education levels (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) [32][33][34]. A focus question was constructed, with inclusion and exclusion criteria using the PICOS framework recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute for examining qualitative studies [35] and as described in a review published recently by Tarrosh et al (2022) [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and M.M.AL.) judged the value of included published articles based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies [35,36]. Any differences were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached with a third author (B.M.M.).…”
Section: Quality Of Involved Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations