A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Oral Health Literacy Tools

Abstract

The aims of this systematic review were to critically appraise the quality of the cross-cultural adaptation and the psychometric properties of the translated versions of oral health literacy assessment tools. CINAHL (EBSCO), Medline (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis were searched systematically. Studies focusing on cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of oral health literacy tools were included. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Sixteen oral health literacy instruments in 11 different languages were included in this systematic review. However, only seven instruments met the criteria for an accurate cross-cultural adaptation process, while the remaining tools failed to meet at least one criterion for suitable quality of cross-cultural adaptation process. None of the studies evaluated all the aspects of psychometric properties. Most of the studies reported internal consistency, reliability, structural validity, and construct validity. Despite adequate ratings for some reported psychometric properties, the methodological quality of studies on translated versions of oral health literacy tools was mostly doubtful to inadequate. Researchers and clinicians should follow standard guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and assess all aspects of psychometric properties for using oral health literacy tools in cross-cultural settings.

A psychometric network perspective to oral health literacy: Examining the replicability of network properties across the general community and older adults from Brazil

“…Yet, a disproportionately higher share of OHL studies is conducted in high-income countries and the majority of tools were developed in English, which raises concerns about a potential lack of cultural and linguistic sensitivity in multicultural and non-English-speaking contexts. [1,14] Brazil is a unique case of a densely populated and diverse country with marked social gradients in oral health and a dynamic healthcare system. [15] A relatively recent expansion of public dental services has contributed to facilitating the access of lower-income groups to dental treatments, although important barriers remain to be overcome.…”

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Kurdish Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-KU) Scale

“…A systematic review examining the articles in 16 health literacy tools showed that most of the included studies had methodological flaws, did not follow all the steps of cross-cultural adoption, and thus, most included studies were rated as low-quality. 25…”

The relationship between dental anxiety and oral health literacy with oral health-related quality of life

“…Over a decade, oral health literacy (OHL) has gathered significant interest from healthcare professionals and policymakers due to its considerable effect on oral health outcomes [ 12 , 13 ]. Considered a multifaceted concept, OHL has consistently been examined in dental research [ 13 , 14 ] and is indicated as a potential determinant of oral health behaviors, outcomes, and access to dental services [ 14 ].…”