2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1691-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] The mechanism of action is not entirely clear; however, inhibition of afferent signals presumably interrupts inappropriate detrusor contractions. 18,19 Although originally not thought to be a promising treatment option for patients with neurogenic bladder disorders, more recent studies suggest that these patients can benefit from SNM and up to 68% of patients in the test phase and 92% of patients in the permanent SNM phase can be successfully treated; 10,11 we report similar success rates (56.5 and 92.3%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] The mechanism of action is not entirely clear; however, inhibition of afferent signals presumably interrupts inappropriate detrusor contractions. 18,19 Although originally not thought to be a promising treatment option for patients with neurogenic bladder disorders, more recent studies suggest that these patients can benefit from SNM and up to 68% of patients in the test phase and 92% of patients in the permanent SNM phase can be successfully treated; 10,11 we report similar success rates (56.5 and 92.3%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Many patients have achieved significant improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms and bowel disorders, such as fecal incontinence and constipation. 5,[7][8][9] Originally, SNM was not considered as an option for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD); however, some studies now suggest that SNM is also effective in this group of patients. 10,11 The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical effects of SNM on patients with neurogenic bladder and/or bowel dysfunction who had multiple symptoms secondary to spinal cord disease or injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the reported success rates for subjects who received the implantation varied between 60% and 100%, an intention-totreat (ITT) analysis in a recent systematic review revealed success rates between 21% and 48% for one-stage implantation with PNE and 75% to 80% for two-stage implantation. 18 A recent prospective multicentre trial reported 36-month data using the two-stage technique. 19 Of 340 patients who received stimulation, 272 had the permanent implant.…”
Section: Sacral Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, electrical stimulation has been used to treat bladder disorders, especially for urinary retention and incontinence and the efficacy is promising [11, 12]. The electrical stimulations mostly used were transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS), percutaneous tibal nerve stimulation (PTNS) and sacral neuromodulation (SNM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%