A systematic review of BIM usage for life cycle impact assessment

Abstract

PurposeThis paper searches for integration methods proposed by different authors that assess the life cycle of a building using models of building information modeling (BIM) and it also compares and discusses them.Design/methodology/approachSystematic literature review (SLR) is selected as the main research method of the present paper, aiming to collect and critically analyze multiple research studies. This paper is not only limited to studies where the whole life cycle has been assessed but also includes other papers which only integrated BIM to analyze carbon footprint, embodied carbon dioxide (CO2) or energy consumption.FindingsTaking into account the countries that have published articles about the subject, it is possible to deduce that it has been studied in all of the continents, except Africa. In comparison with other continents, Asia and Europe have developed more studies. Furthermore, 76% of the 34 selected articles were published in journals and only 24% in conferences proceedings, and the number of papers that relates life cycle assessment (LCA) methods using BIM has grown from 2013 to 2015, proving that the current theme is relevant. Several aspects of this literature review show the need to develop automated processes for LCA of buildings during the project's development phase. There is already a tendency to compare LCA results for buildings applied to BIM models, contributing to decision-making related to alternate projects, selection of materials, suppliers and components from an environmental perspective.Originality/valueIn the current global scenario, it is the notorious negative impact on the environment over the years caused by the architecture, engineering and construction industry (AEC). The integration of BIM–LCA can reduce time and improve the application of environmental analysis. Moreover, the proper application of a LCA method to evaluate the environmental impacts of the project can be hindered due to lack of information in the database about the materials or due to failures in the interoperability between BIM software and the LCA tool.

Enhancing Building Energy Efficiency through Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Building Energy Modeling (BEM) Integration: A Systematic Review

“…However, it is inconsistent when it comes to integration with other tools. According to Crippa et al [28], using Revit (from Autodesk) to develop a practical model of the building, including its structures, and researching the energy consumption and utilization via the energy use intensity (EUI) tends to be a feasible integration strategy for the BEM in BIM. There is a need for further research to determine the validity of the results to establish the possibility of modeling the energy trends of a structure and thus determine the potential economic and environmental objectives.…”

Minimizing Cost Overrun in Rail Projects through 5D-BIM: A Systematic Literature Review

“…The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to give a quick, detailed overview of the literature and the main trends. The SLR will be used to map the knowledge gaps and synthesise the existing body of knowledge [360][361][362].…”

A Review on Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Buildings Based on Building Information Modeling

“…BIM has been widely used in the life cycle management of buildings (as shown in Table 1). After Eleftheriadis et al (2017) reviewed research about life cycle energy efficiency based on BIM, more and more review articles focused on the green BIM applications in life cycle environmental impact (Wong & Zhou, 2015;Muller et al, 2019;Crippa et al, 2020). In particular, several reviews related to the integration of BIM and life cycle assessment (LCA) for environmental sustainability (Soust-Verdaguer et al, 2017;Seyis, 2020;Obrecht et al, 2020).…”