A systematic review of Asian community participation in biosphere reserves

Abstract

Purpose Managing biosphere reserves (BR) have become more challenging regarding the socio-cultural conflict between communities and BR administrators. For the past two decades, community participation (CP) has become the central narrative for BR management practices in Asia. This paper aims to set out to analyse the current literature because of the paucity of systematic reviews on CP in Asian BR. Also, it proffers possible solutions to enhance biosphere performance. Design/methodology/approach In total, 31 related studies were identified from the Scopus, Web of Science databases and materials from organisations in the field of practice of territorial conservation. Three themes emerged from the review – willingness to participate, encumbrances and possible solutions. Findings Factors that influence community willingness to participate in a BR, encumbrances facing the community and possible policy solutions to enhance CP in a BR in Asia were the three themes that emerged from the review. The factors that influence community willingness were categorised into the level of participants in education, perceived waste of time, no confidence of the outcome, okay with current management, land owned, household size and gender factors. Research limitations/implications This paper’s recommendations were based on empirical literature reviewed systematically but do not compromise the robustness concerning BR management practices in Asia. It was established that to enrich the findings of this research, regional studies of CP in BR should be conducted, including primary source data using the mixed methods paradigm. Practical implications As part of the practical implications, recommendations were highlighted to enhance CP in BR. Also, the paper suggested that BR administrators should have two-way communication mechanisms, cross-sectoral participation and collaboration, implement locally-based solutions through full engagement of community members in decision-making. Originality/value This is probably the first systematic review paper on BR management practices in Asia. Filling the theoretical gap via systematic review was part of the significant contribution to CP in Asian BR.

A systematic review of green building practices implementation in Africa

“…A total of 21 years period is a satisfactory time to evaluate the progress of previously published articles concerning GB and implementation in Africa. This agrees with Jaafar et al (2021) that used 19 years duration as satisfactory for a review paper. The selection approach adopted for articles was based on peer-reviewed published papers.…”

“…Scopus and Web of Science were the main databases employed and supported with selected published articles from Google Scholars. Jaafar et al , 2021 reported that journals in the Web of Science database are over 33,000 and 256 disciplines coverage. Whilst Scopus database is over 22,800 articles and 5,000 publishers.…”

Tourists’ satisfaction with Islamic attributes of destination: a systematic mapping study

“…The choice of these databases was due to their reliability and comprehensive coverage of academic journals. According to Jaafar et al (2021), the number of Scopus database journals exceeded 22,800 journals and 5,000 publishers, while the Web of Science database covers over 33,000 journals and around 256 disciplines, which explains why Web of Science and Scopus are considered the most reliable academic databases.…”

The multi-stakeholder role in Asian sustainable ecotourism: a systematic review

“…Nevertheless, the studies mentioned above have highlighted some critical roles multi-stakeholders play in achieving ecotourism sustainability. Researchers such as Salman et al (2021c) andJaafar et al (2021) have noted that multiple stakeholders are key to implementing ecotourism; therefore, their roles should be adequately understood. This calls for leadership among multi-stakeholders.…”