2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-1101-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of approaches to improve practice, detection and treatment of unhealthy alcohol use in primary health care: a role for continuous quality improvement

Abstract: Background: Unhealthy alcohol use involves a spectrum from hazardous use (exceeding guidelines but no harms) through to alcohol dependence. Evidence-based management of unhealthy alcohol use in primary health care has been recommended since 1979. However, sustained and systematic implementation has proven challenging. The Continuing Quality Improvement (CQI) process is designed to enable services to detect barriers, then devise and implement changes, resulting in service improvements. Methods: We conducted a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the vast majority of 91% of French GPs did not use any test to screen for hazardous drinking in comparison to 77% of Swiss GPs. Even more daunting in this context may be the systematic review about strategies to improve the implementation of SBI (28) including results from 13 countries such as USA, Australia, GBR, and Spain showing that none of the tested strategies showed signi cant improvement regarding patient outcomes. We believe hence that the substantial number of barriers reported in previous studies indicates some 'deeper' con ict being rooted in the inherent characteristics of BI and we'd like to ask, is the time ripe now to quit forcing the implementation of BI into routine care?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the vast majority of 91% of French GPs did not use any test to screen for hazardous drinking in comparison to 77% of Swiss GPs. Even more daunting in this context may be the systematic review about strategies to improve the implementation of SBI (28) including results from 13 countries such as USA, Australia, GBR, and Spain showing that none of the tested strategies showed signi cant improvement regarding patient outcomes. We believe hence that the substantial number of barriers reported in previous studies indicates some 'deeper' con ict being rooted in the inherent characteristics of BI and we'd like to ask, is the time ripe now to quit forcing the implementation of BI into routine care?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the vast majority of 91% of French GPs did not use any test to screen for hazardous drinking in comparison to 77% of Swiss GPs. Even more daunting in this context may be the systematic review about strategies to improve the implementation of SBI [27] including results from 13 countries such as USA, Australia, GBR, and Spain showing that none of the tested strategies showed significant improvement regarding patient outcomes. We believe hence that the substantial number of barriers reported in previous studies indicates some 'deeper' conflict being rooted in the inherent characteristics of BI and we'd like to ask, is the time ripe now to quit forcing the implementation of BI into routine care?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patterns of drinking and harms have roots in ongoing trauma from colonisation [ 8 ]. Other Indigenous peoples who have been colonised have suffered increases in harms from alcohol, however, there are very few studies addressing alcohol screening in Indigenous populations [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation studies in general primary care aim to increase the absolute number of alcohol screening events or patients screened. A recent systematic review showed that 34 of 44 studies aiming to improve alcohol screening resulted in significant increases in rates [ 9 ]. However, none investigated whether such interventions resulted in appropriate screening frequency or regularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%