2023
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1178403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of CD22 CAR T-cells alone or in combination with CD19 CAR T-cells

Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are an emerging therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. While CD19 CAR-T cells have been FDA-approved, CAR T-cells targeting CD22, as well as dual-targeting CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells, are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD22-targeting CAR T-cell therapies. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inversely to the efficacy evaluations, the safety analysis of CRS showed that the combination of anti-CD19/22 CAR T-cell therapy resulted in the least CRS event, which aligned with a previous meta-analysis [ 52 ]. A retrospective study comparing the severe CRS of the single anti-CD19 and the combination of anti-CD19/22 discovered that significantly more patients developed severe CRS in the anti-CD19 group [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inversely to the efficacy evaluations, the safety analysis of CRS showed that the combination of anti-CD19/22 CAR T-cell therapy resulted in the least CRS event, which aligned with a previous meta-analysis [ 52 ]. A retrospective study comparing the severe CRS of the single anti-CD19 and the combination of anti-CD19/22 discovered that significantly more patients developed severe CRS in the anti-CD19 group [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, our analysis revealed that this approach was inferior compared to the anti-CD19 or anti-CD22 groups in achieving MRD-CR. Conversely, another meta-analysis discovered a notably higher CR rate when using anti-CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy in comparison to the use of single-target CD22 CAR T-cells [ 52 ]. Nevertheless, it is still early to state the conclusion regarding the performance of anti-CD19/CD22 due to the limited number of studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidences of total and severe CRS were 87% and 6%, respectively. The incidences of ICANS and severe ICANS were 16% and 3%, respectively [97]. 50% hypotension 42% anemia 33% grade 3 CRS 21%, 25%, 27%, and 11% neurological events depending on the dose [114] ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia; CR: complete remission; Cri: complete remission with incomplete count recovery; CRS: cytokine release syndrome; ICANS: immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Nr: not reported; OS: overall survival; R/R: relapsed/refractory.…”
Section: Clinical Trials Using Car T-cells In Allmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Currently, various CD22-CAR T have entered phase 1 and/or 2 clinical trials, but no phase 3. In a meta-analysis with a data cutoff in March 2022, a total of seven CD22-CAR T clinical trials with 149 patients had primary efficacy data, but only two enrolled patients with lymphoma ( 33 ). A single center phase 1/1b study at Stanford University (NCT04088890) is one of the first trials using autologous CD22-CAR T to treat R/R LBCL ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: B-cell Non-hodgkin Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 99%