2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03255-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in pediatric, recurrent ependymoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic value of tumor WHO grade in ependymomas had been debated (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Our study found that tumor pathology grade was a significant prognostic factor regarding PFS and OS in CEs; WHO grade II CEs had longer PFS and OS compared with WHO grade III tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The prognostic value of tumor WHO grade in ependymomas had been debated (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Our study found that tumor pathology grade was a significant prognostic factor regarding PFS and OS in CEs; WHO grade II CEs had longer PFS and OS compared with WHO grade III tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…If no local treatment is feasible, chemotherapy can be administered alone [55]. However, prognosis of children with recurrent ependymoma remains poor [68]. A recently published retrospective analysis reported an increased risk for recurrence in patients with tumors with gain of chromosome 1q and/or PFA-methylation profile, further demonstrating only little benefit from resurgery and reirradiation in case of relapse [69].…”
Section: Therapy Of Spinal Ependymomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ependymomas (EPN) are a molecularly and clinically heterogeneous group of neoplasms which occur throughout the nervous system [1]. In children, EPN represent the second most common malignant brain tumors, with a prognosis still dismal in approximately 50% of the patients [2,3]. The extensive molecular characterization and more indepth knowledge of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease have so far not translated into substantial improvement in clinical practice as treatment remains challenging because of high intratumor heterogeneity and intrinsic chemoresistance [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%