2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2021.101650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. infection in cattle: A zoonotic concern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual studies had no substantial impact on the total prevalence of Blastocystis infection, as evidenced by the sensitivity analysis results. An obvious gap exists in terms of comprehensive epidemiological studies on Blastocystis infection in animal taxa, and only recently have meta-analyses reported a calculated prevalence rate of 52.4% (95% CI 43.9–60.7%), 31.2% (95% CI 11.2–62%) and 24.4% (95% CI 16.9–33.9%) in domestic pigs, wild boars [ 9 ] and cattle [ 6 ], respectively. Comparison of findings shows that the global frequency of Blastocystis infection is much lower in dogs and cats than in cattle, pigs and wild boars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual studies had no substantial impact on the total prevalence of Blastocystis infection, as evidenced by the sensitivity analysis results. An obvious gap exists in terms of comprehensive epidemiological studies on Blastocystis infection in animal taxa, and only recently have meta-analyses reported a calculated prevalence rate of 52.4% (95% CI 43.9–60.7%), 31.2% (95% CI 11.2–62%) and 24.4% (95% CI 16.9–33.9%) in domestic pigs, wild boars [ 9 ] and cattle [ 6 ], respectively. Comparison of findings shows that the global frequency of Blastocystis infection is much lower in dogs and cats than in cattle, pigs and wild boars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General consensus on the transmission of Blastocystis and is that infection occurs through the fecal–oral route with the ingestion of cyst-contaminated water or food [ 5 ]. Zoonotic transmission may also be possible through close animal-human contact, but the extent and frequency of such events remain largely unknown, requiring more in-depth investigation [ 6 , 7 ]. Symptomatic human infections may manifest as diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and cutaneous lesions (urticaria) [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal-to-human transmission of ST5 has been reported in pigs and their caretakers in China and Australia ( Yan et al., 2007 ; Wang et al., 2014 ). ST10 and ST14 are commonly found in livestock compared to humans ( Shams et al., 2021 ; Hublin et al., 2021 ). ST10 and ST14 have been rarely reported in humans in healthy school children from Senegal, thus highlighting their low zoonotic potential ( Khaled et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-common STs (ST5, ST10, and ST14) have diverse geographical distributions. ST5 is probably the most frequently circulating STs among pigs, and has a 1.64% global carriage rate in human samples (Asghari et al, 2021;Hublin et al, 2021). In China, ST5 is the dominant subtype infecting artiodactyls (Ning et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, cattle have been widely studied for the presence of this protozoan around the world [10], but reports in Europe remain scarce with only three epidemiological surveys conducted so far in the UK [11], Denmark [12], and Spain [13]. A recent synthesis highlighted a 24.4% (95% CI: 16.9-33.9) prevalence for Blastocystis sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%