2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01737-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors involved in bone flap resorption after decompressive craniectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in human medicine, cranioplasty is more often performed for decompressive surgery after stroke or traumatic brain injury (contaminated or bruised wound) than after an intracranial tumor resection. The use of an autologous bone flap is widely used for skull defect reconstruction in humans and the most frequent complications associated with these techniques are aseptic bone flap resorption and septic complications [ 26 ]. Synthetic materials, such as PMMA, hydroxyapatite, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or titanium plates, are also used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in human medicine, cranioplasty is more often performed for decompressive surgery after stroke or traumatic brain injury (contaminated or bruised wound) than after an intracranial tumor resection. The use of an autologous bone flap is widely used for skull defect reconstruction in humans and the most frequent complications associated with these techniques are aseptic bone flap resorption and septic complications [ 26 ]. Synthetic materials, such as PMMA, hydroxyapatite, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or titanium plates, are also used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranioplasty is defined as the reimplantation of either previously removed autologous skull flaps after a decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) or implantation of a synthetic flap (SF) and is performed after regress of the malignant brain swelling at an interval of several weeks to months following DH [ 1 , 2 ]. Although the surgical procedure is regarded as one of the simplest in neurosurgery, it is associated with an unusually high rate of early and/or secondary postoperative complications [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Overall cranioplasty related complications are significantly higher after the reimplantation of an autologous bone flap (ABF) compared to an SF, mostly because of the development of bone flap resorption (BFR), which is only seen after cranioplasty with ABFs [ 6 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall cranioplasty related complications are significantly higher after the reimplantation of an autologous bone flap (ABF) compared to an SF, mostly because of the development of bone flap resorption (BFR), which is only seen after cranioplasty with ABFs [ 6 , 8 ]. BFR, which is also called aseptic bone necrosis or osteonecrosis, has been long recognized as the most common ABF-specific cranioplasty complication with an estimated pooled incidence of 15% to almost every second patient, according to recently published clinical systematic reviews [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 8 ]. Further specific volumetric studies on ABFs identified much higher rates of BFR, namely from 77 to 90% [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surgeons favor autologous bone flaps because of their excellent histocompatibility [11,12]. However, fixation of autogenous bone flaps still requires a metal coupling piece and often results in bone resorption, especially in younger patients [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%