2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As already extensively discussed by Haney et al. in a recent review on laparoscopic versus open liver resections, the minimally invasive approach seemed to be safer for minor liver resections when performed in minimally invasive surgery 47 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As already extensively discussed by Haney et al. in a recent review on laparoscopic versus open liver resections, the minimally invasive approach seemed to be safer for minor liver resections when performed in minimally invasive surgery 47 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In order to better understand the impact of our review in the HPB context we compared our results to other laparoscopic and open series reported in literature. [47][48][49][50]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PONV occurred in only three patients undergoing CSEA. The complications rate was low (Table 4) as reported in a large series [57][58][59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Blood loss during laparoscopy is greatly reduced compared with that during open surgery ( 26 , 27 ). Through preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction and intraoperative ICG, the relationship between large blood vessels and tumors can be fully identified and the possibility of major bleeding can be reduced, thereby reducing intraoperative bleeding ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%