2021
DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2021.1990997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of maintenance treatment for psychotic depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the proportions of the collected antidepressants were similar between the treatment groups, various antipsychotics were collected by the combination therapy group. To our knowledge, there are only four antipsychotics that have been examined as part of antidepressant + antipsychotic combination therapy in randomized controlled studies, namely, olanzapine, quetiapine, perphenazine, and haloperidol 8–10,35–37 . In our study 50.7% of the patients collected olanzapine, 11.2% quetiapine, 6.6% haloperidol, and 1.5% perphenazine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the proportions of the collected antidepressants were similar between the treatment groups, various antipsychotics were collected by the combination therapy group. To our knowledge, there are only four antipsychotics that have been examined as part of antidepressant + antipsychotic combination therapy in randomized controlled studies, namely, olanzapine, quetiapine, perphenazine, and haloperidol 8–10,35–37 . In our study 50.7% of the patients collected olanzapine, 11.2% quetiapine, 6.6% haloperidol, and 1.5% perphenazine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…After 36 weeks of follow‐up, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of combination therapy; 23.2% of the participants finishing the study suffered a relapse in the combination group compared with 58.6% in the monotherapy group. But, when all three studies in our review were synthesized in meta‐analysis, there was no significant difference between combination therapy and monotherapy; however, the evidence was of low quality due to substantial heterogeneity between the studies, small sample sizes, and few events 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations