A systematic review and meta‐analysis of digital interventions targeted at individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD), emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD), and related symptoms

Drews‐Windeck, Elea; Greenwood, Kathryn; Cavanagh, Kate

doi:10.1002/jclp.23523

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 102 publications

(303 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many young people, recognizing their need for help, are turning to technology, including smartphone apps, websites, and social media, to self-manage their mental well-being [ 15 ]. Research findings support the efficacy of digital mental health interventions in improving treatment outcomes in severe mental health conditions such as psychosis [ 16 - 18 ] and borderline personality disorder (BPD) [ 19 ]. Web-based treatment programs have also demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of face-to-face psychotherapy [ 20 - 22 ], and self-guided smartphone-based mental health interventions are proving to be promising self-management tools for depression and anxiety symptoms [ 23 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 83%

A Novel Blended Transdiagnostic Intervention (eOrygen) for Youth Psychosis and Borderline Personality Disorder: Uncontrolled Single-Group Pilot Study

O'Sullivan,

McEnery,

Cagliarini

et al. 2024

JMIR Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Integrating innovative digital mental health interventions within specialist services is a promising strategy to address the shortcomings of both face-to-face and web-based mental health services. However, despite young people’s preferences and calls for integration of these services, current mental health services rarely offer blended models of care. Objective This pilot study tested an integrated digital and face-to-face transdiagnostic intervention (eOrygen) as a blended model of care for youth psychosis and borderline personality disorder. The primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen. The secondary aim was to assess pre-post changes in key clinical and psychosocial outcomes. An exploratory aim was to explore the barriers and facilitators identified by young people and clinicians in implementing a blended model of care into practice. Methods A total of 33 young people (aged 15-25 years) and 18 clinicians were recruited over 4 months from two youth mental health services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: (1) the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, an early intervention service for first-episode psychosis; and (2) the Helping Young People Early Clinic, an early intervention service for borderline personality disorder. The feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen were evaluated via an uncontrolled single-group study. Repeated measures 2-tailed t tests assessed changes in clinical and psychosocial outcomes between before and after the intervention (3 months). Eight semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with the young people, and 3 focus groups, attended by 15 (83%) of the 18 clinicians, were conducted after the intervention. Results eOrygen was found to be feasible, acceptable, and safe. Feasibility was established owing to a low refusal rate of 25% (15/59) and by exceeding our goal of young people recruited to the study per clinician. Acceptability was established because 93% (22/24) of the young people reported that they would recommend eOrygen to others, and safety was established because no adverse events or unlawful entries were recorded and there were no worsening of clinical and social outcome measures. Interviews with the young people identified facilitators to engagement such as peer support and personalized therapy content, as well as barriers such as low motivation, social anxiety, and privacy concerns. The clinician focus groups identified evidence-based content as an implementation facilitator, whereas a lack of familiarity with the platform was identified as a barrier owing to clinicians’ competing priorities, such as concerns related to risk and handling acute presentations, as well as the challenge of being understaffed. Conclusions eOrygen as a blended transdiagnostic intervention has the potential to increase therapeutic continuity, engagement, alliance, and intensity. Future research will need to establish the effectiveness of blended models of care for young people with complex mental health conditions and determine how to optimize the implementation of such models into specialized services.

show abstract