2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone iodine lavage in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection of hip and knee arthroplasties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of four studies were reported on PJI 17,18,20,22 . Among them, Martin et al, 22 including primary and revision arthroplasty, eliminated the revision cases, recalculated the results to obtain the OR, and then combined them with other results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of four studies were reported on PJI 17,18,20,22 . Among them, Martin et al, 22 including primary and revision arthroplasty, eliminated the revision cases, recalculated the results to obtain the OR, and then combined them with other results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another basic science study found that povidone-iodine, sodium hypochlorite, and acetic acid-based irrigants all demonstrated eradication of all bacterial growth in <2 minutes of contact 9 . Five of 7 trials in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis found a benefit in reducing PJI rates with the use of topical vancomycin powder and povidone-iodine solution, but the studies were of poorer quality with varying dosing and also found higher rates of wound complications in those patients receiving vancomycin powder alone 10 . A systematic review and meta-analysis published last year specifically on the use of vancomycin powder did find a reduction in PJI rates; however, the quality of those studies were poor as well 11 .…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal irrigation solution should not only have a good sterilization effect but also have the characteristics of low concentration, good stability, low irritation, low cost, safety, and so on ( Chen et al, 2021 ). Various irrigation solutions are currently being used, for example, sterile saline solution was the most frequently used fluid ( Trevillion, 2008 ), followed by povidone-iodine ( Martin et al, 2022 ), chlorhexidine ( Willigenburg et al, 2023 ), hydrogen peroxide ( Mohammadi et al, 2013 ), and antibiotic solutions ( Siafaka et al, 2016 ; Ameeduzzafar et al, 2018 ). However, considering that the antibacterial properties of these irrigation solutions were mostly evaluated using Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus ( Zhou et al, 2017 ; Aubert-Viard et al, 2019 ), which was different from the microbiota composition of the seawater immersion wound, common medical irrigations have little effect when the affected area is immersed in seawater, and rarely, irrigations have been reported for the treatment of seawater-immersed wounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%