2002
DOI: 10.1002/dys.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic procedure for identifying and classifying children with Dyscalculia among primary school children in India

Abstract: This paper describes the procedures adopted by two independent studies in India for identifying and classifying children with dyscalculia in primary schools. For determining the presence of dyscalculia both inclusionary and exclusionary criteria were used. When other possible causes of arithmetic failure had been excluded, figures for dyscalculia came out as 5.98% (15 cases out of 251) in one study and 5.54% (78 out of 1408) in the second. It was found in the latter study that 40 out of the 78 (51.27%) also ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
1
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
34
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This prevalence rate has been reported by researchers across the globe (Gross-Tsur, Manor, & Shalev, 1996;Ramaa & Gowramma, 2002), as reviewed elsewhere (Shalev, Auerbach, Mannor, & Gross-Tsur, 2000). Moreover, results from the first population-based prevalence study in the United States suggest that the cumulative incidence of math learning disability (MLD) ranges from 6 percent to 14 percent, depending on how MLD is defined (Barbaresi, Katusic, Colligan, Weaver, & Jacobson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This prevalence rate has been reported by researchers across the globe (Gross-Tsur, Manor, & Shalev, 1996;Ramaa & Gowramma, 2002), as reviewed elsewhere (Shalev, Auerbach, Mannor, & Gross-Tsur, 2000). Moreover, results from the first population-based prevalence study in the United States suggest that the cumulative incidence of math learning disability (MLD) ranges from 6 percent to 14 percent, depending on how MLD is defined (Barbaresi, Katusic, Colligan, Weaver, & Jacobson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Ramaa (2002) states that dyscalculia's comorbidity with ADHD or dyslexia occurs in approximately one quarter of cases although comorbidity with dyslexia appears to produce the most profound impairments when compared to those with dyscalculia alone, or those with dyscalculia and ADHD. However, it is vitally important to have clear diagnostic criteria in order to understand the prevalence of dyscalculia (Devine et al, 2013).…”
Section: Dyscalculiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that all students had serious difficulty in arithmetic. However, no attempt was made in the study to identify the factors responsible for these difficulties; as a result, there could have been some percentage of children showing the specific syndrome of developmental dyscalculia among the subjects (Ramaa & Gowramma, 2002). Researchers have reported that between 70% and 80% of South African primary school children, overwhelmingly from disadvantaged schools, are completing their primary schooling acquiring only a rudimentary knowledge and understanding of mathematics and have limited proficiency in even basic arithmetic (Kay & Yeo, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of dyslexia has been reported to be 2-18% in primary school children in India, of dysgraphia 14%, and of dyscalculia 5.5%. [1][2][3] Learning disorders are not pure syndromes. They are developmental disorders and are multidimensional in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%