1997
DOI: 10.1109/22.575603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic optimum design of waveguide-to-microstrip transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, differentiating through FDFD involves an electromagnetic simulation with (∂f obj /∂E i ) T /(−iω i ) as the source. Similar results exist for other simulation methods [27,41,38].…”
Section: Mathematical Detailssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, differentiating through FDFD involves an electromagnetic simulation with (∂f obj /∂E i ) T /(−iω i ) as the source. Similar results exist for other simulation methods [27,41,38].…”
Section: Mathematical Detailssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The gradient is computed using reverse-mode autodifferentiation, also commonly known as backpropagation, which is an efficient method to compute the gradient of a function with few outputs (in this case one) and many inputs (dimensionality of the parametrization). Backpropagation through the electromagnetic simulation is also often referred to as the adjoint method or adjoint simulation [27]. The special name arises from the fact that the computation involves another electromagnetic simulation with the same permittivity but different source.…”
Section: A5 Executing the Optimization Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplified sinusoidal current distribution on the probe for the spectral domain is used to calculate the input impedance in Reference [16]. Based on the finite element method, a more rigorous approach 095001-2 is demonstrated in Reference [17]. In this design, using the theory mentioned in References [18,19], the input impedance of the probe can be expressed as below:…”
Section: A Novel Waveguide-to-microstrip Transition Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, a number of techniques have been studied on SIW‐to‐waveguide transitions at microwave and millimeter‐wave frequency. There are some planar circuit‐waveguide transitions have been reported in past years by using various techniques. The vertical transfer technique is applied in transition at W‐band (75–110 GHz) by multi‐layer PCB process, which achieved a frequency bandwidth of 20% for S11 less than −14 dB and an insertion loss of 1.7 dB at 91.8 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition working at Ka‐band is realized by using a radial probe extended from an SIW inserted into a height‐tapered waveguide, and the results show that an insertion loss less than 2.5 dB and a return loss better than 14 dB in 28.3‐39.5 GHz. The E/H plane microstrip probe is studied in, and a W‐band E‐plane waveguide‐to‐microstrip probe transition has been designed in with a return loss better than 25 dB. The end inserted magnetic field coupling technique is applied in transition, which shows the insertion loss of the back‐to‐back transition is less than 2.5 dB in the Ka‐band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%