2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13115817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs

Abstract: This paper presents the findings from a systematic literature review on the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The main research question was “How can the quality criteria for MOOCs identified in the analysed studies from the systematic literature review be best organised in a categorisation scheme?” The systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA procedures. After conducting the screening and eligibility analysis according the pre-defined criteria, 103 studies were finally selecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavioural engagement is sometimes interwoven with social engagement, which is defined as learner-learner and learner-instructor interaction in MOOCs [27]. A recent review of 103 MOOC studies indicated that 19 articles addressed social aspects of learning in MOOCs [37]. Some scholars reported social engagement as a subdimension of behavioural engagement [38].…”
Section: Conceptualisation Of Learner Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural engagement is sometimes interwoven with social engagement, which is defined as learner-learner and learner-instructor interaction in MOOCs [27]. A recent review of 103 MOOC studies indicated that 19 articles addressed social aspects of learning in MOOCs [37]. Some scholars reported social engagement as a subdimension of behavioural engagement [38].…”
Section: Conceptualisation Of Learner Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are many types and providers of MOOC available to distribute knowledge and skills, it could be challenging to set general quality standards for MOOC. Therefore, MOOC should rather be seen as a means for discovery for learners, meaning that a process based approach rather than an outcome-based approach should be implemented [28].…”
Section: Ict and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 presents a 10-step approach to complete an online food research project with the applicable NQF level outcomes [12] and Bloom's Taxonomy level [28] to enhance students' higher-order thinking skills. For this project-based learning approach, the NQF level of seven was continuously kept in mind.…”
Section: Research Project Steps (First Phase)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experience suggests that MOOCs can be developed at pace, with an appropriately skilled and motivated team, to support learning in a public health emergency, and maintain quality across pedagogical, organisational, technological, and social domains 6 . From a public health perspective, we consider that building individuals’ own capacity to question, to query the data, reports and guidance is essential, and complementary to the circulation of accurate public health information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%