2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review on Android-specific smells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study they also analyze 3 "code smells" typical of object-oriented programming, finding that 93% of Java and Kotlin applications contain at least one [15]. In 2023, Z. Wu et al carried out a literature review on Android-specific "code smells" cataloging the anti-patterns that receive the most attention in literature [41]; while F. Palomba et al show that not all "smells" have an equal impact on energy efficiency [31]. M. Couto et al, on the other hand, studied the impact of refactoring by considering a large number of different applications [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study they also analyze 3 "code smells" typical of object-oriented programming, finding that 93% of Java and Kotlin applications contain at least one [15]. In 2023, Z. Wu et al carried out a literature review on Android-specific "code smells" cataloging the anti-patterns that receive the most attention in literature [41]; while F. Palomba et al show that not all "smells" have an equal impact on energy efficiency [31]. M. Couto et al, on the other hand, studied the impact of refactoring by considering a large number of different applications [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for a secondary study on Android security testing for synthesising existing knowledge, identifying future research directions, and supporting decision-making. However, previous secondary studies have mainly focused on reviewing static analysis techniques [14], [15] or specific research domains, such as mobile malware analysis [16], [17], [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%