A systematic literature review of sociotechnical systems in systems engineering

Abstract

Systems engineers use the term sociotechnical system in academic literature and in their practice. Sociotechnical systems are gaining more attention as systems engineers aspire to address the social elements of their systems engineering practice as well as societal challenges, such as those included in the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Vision 2035. Even though there is a basic working definition of sociotechnical system in the Systems Engineering Book of Knowledge (SEBoK), use of the term varies in systems engineering literature depending on application domain. As systems engineering research and practice venture into social domains, it is critical that systems engineers have a shared understanding of terms they use as a foundation of knowledge and practice. To contribute to this foundation, this study is a systematic literature review of how the term sociotechnical system is used in systems engineering literature. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodological framework and Web of Science (WoS) for conducting the systematic literature review. We only included peer‐reviewed systems engineering academic papers in this study, and these papers had to either explicitly define the term or implicitly define it by context in the paper. In total, 61 papers were included after inclusion criteria were met, and these were evaluated and synthesized into definition categories. Evaluation and synthesis were conducted according to the PRISMA framework by the study authors in order to manage bias. We found that most papers use sociotechnical system generically as a system that includes social (people) and technical elements. Papers with more refined definitions of sociotechnical system stem from two distinct theoretical traditions: ergonomics/safety and philosophy of engineering. We do not aim to propose a single, normative definition of sociotechnical system. This study is limited by including only systems engineering literature since sociotechnical system has established definitions in other disciplines (e.g., social sciences disciplines). However, the outcome of this study provides systems engineers with documented understanding of how the term sociotechnical system is used within systems engineering.

The Digital Evolution Strategies for Overcoming Cybersecurity and Adoption Challenges in French SMEs

“…It underscores the importance of innovation characteristics and the role of change agents in facilitating the adoption process. In contrast, Socio-Technical Systems Theory illuminates how these technologies are integrated into small and medium-sized enterprises' social and organizational structures, emphasizing the need to align technological solutions with human factors to ensure seamless integration and improved organizational activities [33]. This dual-framework approach enables a comprehensive analysis of both the technological and social dimensions influencing cybersecurity adoption in SMEs and developing targeted strategies to overcome technology acceptance barriers and maximize the effectiveness of cybersecurity implementations.…”

“…Many small and medium-sized firms prioritize technological upgrades and process optimization when launching a digital initiative. Unfortunately, this frequently leads to firms ignoring cybersecurity, leaving them open to cyber threats and potential assaults [33]. This fragmented strategy can cause significant disruptions, financial losses, and reputational harm.…”

Framework and Function of Integrated Water Resources Management in Support of Sustainable Development

“…While IWRM was being developed, the search for other frameworks continued in parallel, especially about conflict resolution and the incorporation of social and environmental values in decision making. New paradigms that were developed with similarities to IWRM included Total Water Management [37], One Water [38], Total Water Solutions [39], and versions of systems engineering that seek the merge analysis of technical and socio-technical systems [40]. None of these frameworks has gained as much traction globally as IWRM, although in the US, the One Water concept is currently receiving emphasis.…”

Systems Engineering Education: From Learning Program to Business Value

“…The development of these capabilities and the involved systems are increasingly complex. The complexity is, among other factors, due to the further integration of systems (systems of systems), which are largely supported by digitalization [1], the scope increases from cyber-physical systems [2] to socio-technical systems [3] and a shortage of individual and organizational competence. This increase takes place in the development of systems and capabilities, e.g., in the organizations, processes, and humans with their individual human characteristics, and in the later life cycle when operating in a political, economic, social, technical, environmental, and legal (PESTEL) context.…”