A Systematic Literature Review of Successful Implementation of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Companies: Synthesis of the IPSI Framework

Abstract

The Industry 4.0 paradigm refers to a large set of technologies that will transform the way that the manufacturing industry will perform. Nowadays, those technologies and the potential benefits they offer are not fully understood and mastered by companies, and the propagation of the associated concepts is slow. However, in the past few years, some successful implementations of Industry 4.0-compliant technologies have been seen emerging in the literature. A systematic literature study has been conducted to identify the suggested methodologies for successful implementations. Following this analysis, identified patterns are synthesized as an implementation framework denoted as IPSI (Identification–Preparation–Simulation–Implementation). This framework was synthesized so as to be used for the first implementation of technologies in a company, thus increasing the chances of acceptability of those technologies. Three case studies, concerning three different technologies in three different manufacturing fields, were chosen to be confronted by the framework and its validity on the global manufacturing field is discussed.

How the technologies underlying cyber-physical systems support the reconfigurability capability in manufacturing: a literature review

“…This, together with the fact that CPS disrupt traditional manufacturing paradigms and introduce innovative means also to increase the level of reconfigurability in manufacturing systems, motivated the conduction of a structured literature review. To this regard, only few existing review articles have simultaneously investigated reconfigurable manufacturing and CPS (Bortolini, Galizia, and Mora 2018;Xia and Xi 2019;Ivanov et al 2021;Morgan et al 2021;Cardin 2021), and to the best of authors' knowledge, none of the available review articles aimed at analysing how technologies underlying CPS support the reconfigurability capability along the manufacturing system life cycle. Therefore, the two research domains investigated in the present study are the technologies underlying CPS on the one hand, and the reconfigurability characteristics as main constituents of the reconfigurability capability along system life cycle on the other hand.…”