A systematic literature review of food safety management system implementation in global supply chains

Nguyen, Tram T. B.; Li, Dong

doi:10.1108/bfj-05-2021-0476

Cited by 17 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lastly, effective food safety administration is critical, especially in the agri-food sector, for achieving sustainability and climate goals. Efficient production and distribution practices that ensure food safety can help minimise waste and resource misuse, which are key elements in reducing the environmental impact and advancing towards climate neutrality (Nguyen and Li, 2021).…”

Section: Relationships Between Thementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prior studies showed that there is a research gap in understanding the quantifiable relationship between CSFs, such as top management support, human resource management, infrastructure, integration, external assistance, and food safety administration with the firm's performance in achieving climate neutrality and sustainability (Abbas et al ., 2022, 2023a, b; Yontar, 2023; Nguyen and Li, 2022; King and King, 2020). While studies individually address aspects like the effectiveness of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) in global supply chains (Duong et al ., 2023; Nguyen and Li, 2021), the role of advanced digital technologies in agri-food supply chains (Yontar, 2023), and strategies for reducing waste (Abbas et al ., 2023a), they fall short in explicitly linking these CSFs to the specific goal of climate neutrality within firms. Particularly, the impact of these factors on a firm's carbon footprint, sustainable practices, and overall environmental impact remains underexplored.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical success factors of food safety management for achieving climate neutrality: a multilevel moderated approach with industry revolution 4.0

Duong,

Yap,

Ngo

et al. 2023

IJLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe growing awareness of climate risks associated with food safety issues has drawn the attention of stakeholders urging the food industry to carry out a sustainable food safety management system (FSMS). This study aims to investigate whether the critical success factors (CSFs) of sustainable FSMS can contribute to achieving climate neutrality, and how the adoption of FSMS 4.0 supported by the Industry Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0) technologies moderates the impact of the CSFs on achieving climate neutrality.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data from 255 food production firms in China and Vietnam were utilised for the empirical analysis. The research hypotheses were examined using structural equations modelling (SEM) with route analysis and bootstrapping techniques.FindingsThe results show that top management support, human resource management, infrastructure and integration appear as the significant CSFs that directly impact food production firms in achieving climate neutrality. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the adoption of FSMS 4.0 integrated with the three components (ecosystems, quality standards and robustness) significantly moderates the impact of the CSFs on achieving climate neutrality with lower inputs in human resources, infrastructure investment, integration and external assistance, and higher inputs in strengthening food safety administration.Originality/valueThis study provides empirical findings that fill the research gap in understanding the relationship between climate neutrality and the CSFs of sustainable FSMS while considering the moderating effects of the FSMS 4.0 components. The results provide theoretical and practical insights into how the food production sector can utilise IR 4.0 to attain sustainable FSMS for achieving climate neutrality.

show abstract

Section: Relationships Between Thementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical success factors of food safety management for achieving climate neutrality: a multilevel moderated approach with industry revolution 4.0

Duong,

Yap,

Ngo

et al. 2023

IJLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This finding is likely to be related to food sectors in developing countries like China and Vietnam, where consumers are usually doubtful of their trustworthiness (Rodrigues et al, 2019). Consequently, food businesses require more concrete evidence from their suppliers to convince their customers (Nguyen and Li, 2022b). Certainly, customers profit more from the availability of higher quality food, but businesses have been indirectly pushed to implement multiple assurance procedures, which are costly and their effectiveness are often questionable (Trienekens and Zuurbier, 2008).…”

Section: Suppliers Of Well-performed Food Businessesmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do well-performed food businesses manage suppliers in emerging economies?

Nguyen

2023

IJPDLM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the supplier selection criteria, relationship quality and level of collaboration in Asian food businesses, while also examining the link between these practices and business performance. The research focusses on food manufacturing and exporting companies in two emerging economies, China and Vietnam.Design/methodology/approachFood manufacturing and exporting companies in two emerging economies – China and Vietnam were surveyed and analysed to extract factors that reflect supplier management and business performance along with their relationship by factor analysis and hierarchical regression. Then, a two-step cluster analysis was applied to identify clusters based on supplier management and explore how different business performance groups manage their suppliers.FindingsFour clusters that are distinct sets of food firms with detailed references about their typical characteristics revealing their business performance and supplier management practices. Also, the study confirms that certificates, reliability and inspection results constitute the factor of quality-related criteria for food firms. It is an interesting insight into what firms prioritise in selecting and maintaining collaboration and relationships with suppliers that reflect actual demanding specifications for supplier conformity.Research limitations/implicationsThe study reveals the business status of the studied companies and each group's specific references, such as the criteria they prefer to select suppliers, the relationship quality and the level of collaboration.Originality/valueThe study is a useful reference for both researchers and practitioners to have a comprehensive view of supplier management in the food industry based on the viewpoint of Asian food manufacturers.

show abstract

“…However, even if the adoption of new technology can impact significantly on food safety management systems and protect consumer health in global food supply chain its implementation still requires more investigation and future works (Nguyen & Li, 2021). Consumers appear to be unaware of smart tags as highlighted by research conducted within the EITFOOD SMART TAGS project (https://www.eitfood.eu/ projects/smart-tags-for-improving-consumer-interaction-in-food-valuechain-2020).…”

Section: Implications For Consumers Retailers and Food Processorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of smart biosensors during a food safety incident: Consumers' cognitive‐behavioural responses and willingness to pay

Nocella

Cerroni

2022

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intelligent and active packaging could allow consumers to control cognitive reactions linked to the risk of consuming food products contaminated by microbiological pathogens and thus mitigating negative consequences of food safety incidents. However, despite advances in technology, consumers' reactions and willingness to pay for active and intelligent packaging in the absence and presence of food safety incidents remain somewhat unexplored. To fill such a gap this study incorporates protection motivation theory (PMT) within a contingent valuation survey conducted in the UK to explore consumers' behavioural responses to risk communication in the absence and presence of a food safety incident. These responses were moderated by the possibility of buying hypothetical meat products marketed with biosensors informing consumers of the presence of bacteria post-purchase. A singular approach was developed to identify the following four behavioural responses of the PMT's cognitive mediating process: no response, fear, low response and danger control. Results indicate that the theoretical components of PMT play a different role in the absence and presence of food safety incidents. Respondents who receive risk information are willing to pay more than other participants to adopt precautionary behaviour and that purchasing behaviour varied across these four cognitive-behavioural responses. Governmental institutions, the food industry and retailers should consider working together to reassure consumers by investing in technology that may help consumers to mitigate fear during a food safety incident, but also to develop appropriate risk communication strategies that should focus more on the cognitive-behavioural outcomes analysed in this study.

show abstract

A systematic literature review of food safety management system implementation in global supply chains

Cited by 17 publications

References 61 publications

Critical success factors of food safety management for achieving climate neutrality: a multilevel moderated approach with industry revolution 4.0

Critical success factors of food safety management for achieving climate neutrality: a multilevel moderated approach with industry revolution 4.0

How do well-performed food businesses manage suppliers in emerging economies?

The use of smart biosensors during a food safety incident: Consumers' cognitive‐behavioural responses and willingness to pay

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About