2016
DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpw021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 274 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to take multiple parameters for the risk evaluation into account is it is often addressed with multi-criteria methods in the scientific and technical community. In particular, the such approaches are very useful in risk assessment and management as specified in the review work of de Almeida et al (2017). Multicriteria method are particularly effective thanks to its peculiarity of subdividing a complex problem into its basic components in order to obtain a hierarchical scheme of the phenomenon (Sangiorgio et al, 2020a(Sangiorgio et al, , 2020b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to take multiple parameters for the risk evaluation into account is it is often addressed with multi-criteria methods in the scientific and technical community. In particular, the such approaches are very useful in risk assessment and management as specified in the review work of de Almeida et al (2017). Multicriteria method are particularly effective thanks to its peculiarity of subdividing a complex problem into its basic components in order to obtain a hierarchical scheme of the phenomenon (Sangiorgio et al, 2020a(Sangiorgio et al, , 2020b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other of them are as follows: sustainability issues are analyzed (Shen, Zavads-kas, & Tzeng, 2018;Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Vilutiene, & Adeli, 2017;Zavadskas, Govindan, Antucheviciene, & Turskis, 2016), energy efficient (Kaya, Çolak, & Terzi, 2018;Cajot, Mirakyan, Koch, & Maréchal, 2017;Mardani et al, 2017aMardani et al, , 2017b) and renewable energy (Lee & Chang, 2018;Colak & Kaya, 2017;Kumar et al, 2017;Strantzali & Aravossis, 2016), green supply chain (Banasik, Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Kanellopoulos, Claassen, & van der Vorst, 2018), green technologies (Si, Marjanovic-Halburd, Nasiri, & Bell, 2016), a material choice for natural fiber composites (Noryani, Sapuan, & Mastura, 2018), sustainable material selection (Govindan, Shankar, & Kannan, 2016). de Almeida, Alencar, Garcez, and Ferreira (2017) analyzed MCDM approaches in risk management. Zavadskas, Antucheviciene, Turskis, and Adeli (2016) presented hybrid MCDM review in engineering field; Mardani et al (2017a) reviewed SWARA and WASPAS methods; Ameyaw, Hu, Shan, Chan, and Le (2016) reviewed application of Delphi in construction engineering and management research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of MCDM/A for Risk Management decisions has been increasing lately. A systematic literature review was presented in [36], and the main criterion areas found included safety, financial, environmental, social, and infrastructure. A hybrid FMEA model is applied to evaluate the risk of superficial water gasification systems [26], considering subjective and objective weights and linguistic terms.…”
Section: Mcdm/a For Credit Risk Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%