A systematic literature review of revenue management in passenger transportation

Ammirato, Salvatore; Felicetti, Alberto Michele; Linzalone, Roberto; Volpentesta, Antonio Palmiro; Schiuma, Giovanni

doi:10.1108/mbe-09-2019-0096

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In order to deduce meaningful descriptions of each topic, we implemented a human-based review of a restricted, representative, and relevant subset Q ⊆ P of high-quality papers. Q consisted of those articles in P that match ALL the following criteria [50]:…”

Section: Definition Of Topicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholars from different perspectives agree that agritourism can be the right tool to balance the needs of tourists with those of rural communities, offering real opportunities for economic and social development, while mitigating undesirable impacts on the environment. This paper aims to provide a holistic outlook of the different perspectives under which scientific literature deals with the topic of agritourism as a means to support the sustainable development of rural areas. To reach this aim, we performed a systematic review of the scientific literature in order to point out the linkages between agritourism and sustainability. We analyzed papers through a text mining solution based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) technique to point out the main topics around which the scientific literature on agritourism and sustainability has grown. Topics are further categorized in themes by means of an agglomerative hierarchical clustering procedure. Results are further analyzed to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the current streams of the literature.

show abstract

Section: Definition Of Topicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main limitations are related to the methodology based on theorizing rather on theory building (Matricano, 2015, p. 30). Research propositions presented in the paper are only rooted in a systematic literature review (Ammirato et al, 2020) and do not depend on statistical observations, big data and/or empirical cases. They are the result of reflexive thinking about fintech, RCF and ECF.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Entrepreneurship and fintech development: comparing reward and equity crowdfunding

Troise

Matricano

Candelo

et al. 2021

MBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Starting from the state-of-the-art of Fintech development, this study aims to propose some research propositions comparing reward-crowdfunding (RCF) and equity-crowdfunding (ECF). In this sense, the present research provides a comprehensive analysis of fintech development and – to conceptualize the comparison between RCF and ECF – it focuses on campaigns’ characteristics, aims and post-campaigns scenarios. Design/methodology/approach All the research propositions related to the comparison between RCF and ECF are rooted in dedicated literature. The methodological approach adopted in the present paper can be referred to theorizing. Findings This study suggests that five key elements characterize the development of fintech: regulation, infrastructure, technologies, finance and innovations. The research provides nine propositions: four related to the campaigns’ characteristics; two related to the use of crowdfunding models by entrepreneurs; and three related to the performance of crowdfunded companies. Practical implications By offering nine research propositions, this study is expected to foster and support the investigation of fintech development from an entrepreneurial and managerial point of view. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to explore the fintech development and to propose a comparative approach between RCF and ECF. This research contributes to the current debate on fintech development as well as on the comparison between crowdfunding models.

show abstract

“…Systematic literature reviews are transparent, evidence-based activities (Tranfield et al, 2003) that report the decisions, procedures and conclusions made by those conducting the study (Cook et al, 1997). Similar to the methodology adopted by Ammirato et al (2020) and Grimaldi et al (2017) in their respective literature reviews, our methodology is organized in the following three steps: paper location, paper selection and paper analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital supply chain performance metrics: a literature review

Rasool

Greco

Grimaldi

2021

MBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In the previous decade, a substantial amount of research has been undertaken to measure the digitalized supply chain (DSC) performance. This paper aims to present a systematic literature review on DSC performance measurement metrics to apprehend current practices, recognize gaps and advocate future research itineraries. Design/methodology/approach To guarantee a replicable, rigorous and transparent research process, the authors used a systematic literature review methodology to synthesize the research. A combination of 25 keywords was used to obtain 248 scientific studies in the first step. The balance scorecard (BSC) model was used to categorize 299 gathered performance metrics into 4 BSC perspectives. Findings The review highlighted the need for qualitative performance measuring metrics for DSC. During the review, only one study was identified that primarily focused on developing performance metrics for DSC. Additionally, the review identified that metrics related to internal and financial perspectives received the most attention while the “growth and learning” perspective received the least attention. The review also identified that external partners, such as distributors and suppliers, were virtually ignored in previous literature. Originality/value Although numerous literature reviews have been conducted in the past on the performance measuring metrics for supply chain management, no literature review aiming to synthesize the measuring metrics for DSC has yet been undertaken.

show abstract

A systematic literature review of revenue management in passenger transportation

Cited by 16 publications

References 80 publications

Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review

Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review

Entrepreneurship and fintech development: comparing reward and equity crowdfunding

Digital supply chain performance metrics: a literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About