2023
DOI: 10.1039/d2qi02665a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic investigation of the NMR relaxation properties of Fe(iii)-EDTA derivatives and their potential as MRI contrast agents

Abstract: We report a detailed investigation of the potential as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents of Fe(III) complexes with H4EDTA derivatives containing different spacers: trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (t H4CDTA), cis-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine (c H4CDTA),...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…46 The magnetic field dependence of the three complexes from 1.4 to 9.4 T does not change markedly, although a slight dip is observed at 4.7 T for [Fe(NOHP)] 2+ and [Fe(NOTP)] 3− . Although studies of the full field strength relaxivity dependence are needed, it is interesting to note that NMRD profiles recently reported for EDTA derivatives of Fe( iii ) complexes, 14,22 show a dispersion in r 1 from 10 MHz to 100 MHz with an increase at higher fields, a profile that is not very different than that observed here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…46 The magnetic field dependence of the three complexes from 1.4 to 9.4 T does not change markedly, although a slight dip is observed at 4.7 T for [Fe(NOHP)] 2+ and [Fe(NOTP)] 3− . Although studies of the full field strength relaxivity dependence are needed, it is interesting to note that NMRD profiles recently reported for EDTA derivatives of Fe( iii ) complexes, 14,22 show a dispersion in r 1 from 10 MHz to 100 MHz with an increase at higher fields, a profile that is not very different than that observed here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…46 The magnetic field dependence of the three complexes from 1.4 to 9.4 T does not change markedly, although a slight dip is observed at 4.7 T for [Fe(NOHP)] 2+ and [Fe(NOTP)] 3− . Although studies of the full field strength relaxivity dependence are needed, it is interesting to note that NMRD profiles recently reported for EDTA derivatives of Fe(III) complexes, 14,22 show a dispersion in r 1 from 10 MHz to 100 MHz with an increase at higher fields, a profile that is not very different than that observed here. The T 1 and T 2 water proton relaxation times were measured for LipoA, LipoB and LipoC as a function of concentration of the iron complex in the liposome to obtain the relaxivities of the paramagnetic liposomes on a per iron and per particle basis as described (Table 1 and Table S3 †) As anticipated, the relaxivity values for the liposomal formulations vary substantially based on whether the iron complex is encapsulated or incorporated into the liposome.…”
Section: Biomaterials Science Papersupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2,14 Similar to gadolinium-based contrast agents, high-spin Fe(III) complexes shorten the T 1 relaxation times of water protons through inner-sphere, second-sphere, and outer-sphere water interactions. 10,15,16 Dipole−dipole relaxation mechanisms are dominant, and these interactions are governed by several correlation times including the rotational correlation time (τ r ) of the paramagnetic complex in solution, the exchange rate of the coordinated water molecule (k ex = 1/ τ m ), the distance of the paramagnetic metal ion and the protons of the coordinated water (r MH ), and the electronic relaxation times of the paramagnetic metal ion (τ s ). 17 However, Fe(III) complexes, in contrast to Gd(III)-or Mn(II)-based contrast agents, may have electronic relaxation rates that are sufficiently rapid to limit relaxivity at clinical magnetic field strengths (1.5−3 T).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%