2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020wr028671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Investigation Into the Control of Roughness on the Flow Properties of 3D‐Printed Fractures

Abstract: Fluid transport through rock fractures underlies many natural processes, such as fault rupture (Faulkner et al., 2010), while also influencing hydrocarbon production (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the numerically obtained permeability (dark blue balls) deviates from the cubic law (dark line), this is manifested by the fact that the calculated fracture permeability is all below the one predicted by the cubic law at the same mechanical apertures. This is consistent with many previous studies [8,15,29,49,52].…”
Section: Fracture Permeability Under Normal Stress From Numerical Sim...supporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the numerically obtained permeability (dark blue balls) deviates from the cubic law (dark line), this is manifested by the fact that the calculated fracture permeability is all below the one predicted by the cubic law at the same mechanical apertures. This is consistent with many previous studies [8,15,29,49,52].…”
Section: Fracture Permeability Under Normal Stress From Numerical Sim...supporting
confidence: 94%
“…(a) Although both the connectivity metrics have been improved, and the connectivity metric Γ ′ grows to a greater extent than the connectivity metric Θ ′ (with an average growth of 12% vs. 8%), Θ ′ still has a higher permeability prediction accuracy than that of the Γ ′ (averagely about 18%). Notably, the fracture permeability prediction accuracy by the connectivity metric Θ ′ reaches more than 80%, which is comparable with most common permeability models obtained with laboratory experiments and numerical modeling ( [7,8,29,[53][54][55][56][57], see Figure 4). Moreover, the information required in this study is no more than that of common numerical modeling, yet presents fast and inexpensive computation [27].…”
Section: Fracture Permeability and Connectivity Metricssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The code used here is based on a first principle contact mechanics approach and avoids the assumptions needed in (semi-) analytical approaches or conceptualizations. We investigate a single Carmel mudrock (Kampman et al 2014) sample numerically and experimentally, whose surface was digitized with a digital optical microscope (Keyence 2017; Phillips et al 2021). The numerical investigation is based on a number of randomly selected cross sections used to build 2D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%