2014
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2014.685s07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Focus on Occupational Therapy Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that occupational therapy educators use a limited repertoire of instructional methods compared to the evidence-based teaching practices available throughout professional education literature. If students are expected to use clinical reasoning in complex healthcare environments during entry-level practice (Burke & Harvison, 2014;Gupta & Bilics, 2014), occupational therapy educators must expand their view of teaching to explore new and different instructional methods to adequately prepare students (FoordMay, 2006;Graffam, 2007). Although the literature suggests that educators favor investigation of instructional methods in occupational therapy education research (Gupta & Bilics, 2014;Hooper et al, 2013), a wide variety of these approaches do not appear to be translating to educators' teaching methods or strategies based on our findings.…”
Section: Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding suggests that occupational therapy educators use a limited repertoire of instructional methods compared to the evidence-based teaching practices available throughout professional education literature. If students are expected to use clinical reasoning in complex healthcare environments during entry-level practice (Burke & Harvison, 2014;Gupta & Bilics, 2014), occupational therapy educators must expand their view of teaching to explore new and different instructional methods to adequately prepare students (FoordMay, 2006;Graffam, 2007). Although the literature suggests that educators favor investigation of instructional methods in occupational therapy education research (Gupta & Bilics, 2014;Hooper et al, 2013), a wide variety of these approaches do not appear to be translating to educators' teaching methods or strategies based on our findings.…”
Section: Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Occupational therapists must use clinical reasoning to deliver clientcentered and occupation-based services that are grounded in theory and evidence to meet these complex needs (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2015). Therefore, occupational therapy education must provide contemporary and evidence-based educational practices that yield graduates with the relevant skills for successful practice in dynamic and challenging environments (Burke & Harvison, 2014;Coker, 2010;Furze et al, 2015;Gupta & Bilics, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of an occupational therapy (OT) program is to graduate effective and competent entry-level practitioners (Avi-Itzhak & Krauss, 2010;Burke & Harvison, 2014). The ability to apply knowledge and skills throughout all phases of the OT Process (AOTA, 2014;AOTA, 2008) is a key competency expected of all graduates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, accreditation requirements for entry-level master's programs include compliance with 46 standards explicitly related to understanding and enacting the OT Process (ACOTE, 2012). Thus, educators must select instructional strategies that best prepare students to practice and develop confidence in using their clinical reasoning and psychomotor skills to safely and effectively work with clients (Burke & Harvison, 2014). Unfortunately, there is limited evidence specific to OT education which investigates the effectiveness of using key educational methods to address targeted educational outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues may vary considerably; for example, between cultural and geographical contexts, between levels of education (entry-level vs. graduate level), and between students in different years of study. Building the larger evidence base in occupational therapy education research, but also differentiating between groups for which the evidence may apply, will support educators in addressing factors of importance for their students' success (Burke & Harvison, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%