A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: A mixed methods study

Abstract

BackgroundIn January 2006, Veterans Affairs (VA) disseminated the MOVE!® Weight Management Program to VA medical centers to address the high prevalence of overweight/obesity. In its second year, MOVE! implementation varied widely across facilities. The objective of this study was to understand contextual factors that facilitated or impeded implementation of MOVE! in VA medical centers in the second year after its dissemination.MethodsWe used an embedded mixed methods cross-sectional study design. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously with the primary purpose to explore contextual factors most likely to influence MOVE! implementation effectiveness at five purposively selected facilities. Facilities were selected to maximize variation with respect to participation in MOVE! by candidate Veterans. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 24 staff across the five facilities. Quantitative responses were elicited followed by open-ended questions. The quantitative measures were adapted from a published implementation model. Qualitative analysis was conducted using rigorous content analysis methods.ResultsQualitative and quantitative data converged to strengthen findings that point to several recommendations. Management support can help increase visibility of the program, commit needed resources, and communicate the importance of implementation efforts. Establishing a receptive implementation climate can be accomplished by emphasizing the important role that weight management may have in reducing incidence and severity of obesity-related chronic conditions. Coalescing highly functioning multi-disciplinary teams was an essential step for more effective implementation of MOVE!. In some situations, local champions can overcome challenging barriers in facilities that lack sufficient management support.ConclusionsKey organizational factors at local VA medical centers were strongly associated with MOVE! implementation. Results pointed to recommendations that can help accelerate large-scale dissemination of complex weight management programs.

Evidence-Based Physiotherapy Culture—The Influence of Health Care Leaders in Sweden

“…Managers are not necessarily leaders, but the roles of leaders and managers usually overlap (Yukl, 2006). Research on leadership in relation to implementation of EBP has usually conceptualized leadership as supervisory or managerial leadership (Cummings et al, 2010;Damschroder et al, 2011;Forsman et al, 2012;Gifford Davies, Edwards, Griffin, & Lybanon, 2007;Reichenpfader et al, 2015). However, we specifically sought to include managers whose characteristics were consistent with established definitions of leaders.…”

State of the art conference on weight management in VA: Policy and research recommendations for advancing behavioral interventions

“…In VHA, high implementation facilities, in comparison to low implementation facilities, 12 used networks and communication (interdisciplinary MOVE! teams that met regularly and communicated about MOVE!…”

Behavioral medicine translation in the Veterans Health Administration: editorial to the special section on the Department of Veterans Affairs

“…Through its Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program and the Center for Implementation Practice and Research Support (CIPRS), a resource center for implementation science, the VHA has provided structures and methods for collaboration between researchers and clinical and operational partners to move evidence-based practices into the field [10][11][12]. HSR&D investigators have generated new conceptual models for translation [8,13,14], innovations in evaluation methodologies [15,16], and working laboratories that facilitate change in health care delivery [11,17,18]. The co-location of research and clinical activities within the VHA and the emphasis on quality and implementation provides an environment where findings from clinical research in behavioral medicine can be applied in clinical settings with close collaboration between researchers and clinicians during the translation [9].…”