2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic assessment of threats affecting the rare plants of the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such ratings are based mostly on biodiversity impacts of animal invaders, namely predators and grazers. Moreover, the most convincing cases of plant extinctions associated with plant and animal invasions are from islands where joint effects of grazing, changes in fire regime and plant invasions are the major threats (Hernández‐Yáñez et al., ). There are over 1,000 established (naturalized) non‐native plant species in California (Rejmánek, ), but their presence is usually associated with some form of human‐created disturbance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such ratings are based mostly on biodiversity impacts of animal invaders, namely predators and grazers. Moreover, the most convincing cases of plant extinctions associated with plant and animal invasions are from islands where joint effects of grazing, changes in fire regime and plant invasions are the major threats (Hernández‐Yáñez et al., ). There are over 1,000 established (naturalized) non‐native plant species in California (Rejmánek, ), but their presence is usually associated with some form of human‐created disturbance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, one needs quite a bit of imagination to predict that any native plant species may be driven to extinction by invasive plants per se (Downey & Richardson, ; Gilbert & Levine, ). On the other hand, there is no doubt that invasive plant species contribute to the endangerment of native plant species in concert with other factors like livestock grazing, outdoor recreation and residential development (Didham et al., ; Hernández‐Yáñez et al., ). The major challenge for ecologists working on plant invasions is to quantify the extent of this contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Hernández‐Yáñez et al. ), expenditures on plant conservation efforts being so limited (Negrón‐Ortiz ), and the survival of reintroduced individuals being so low (Godefroid et al. ), there is a critical need to enhance the success of rare plant reintroduction initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.2). Of 861 possible pairwise associations between second level threats, 19% (165) were significant and positive (χ2 test on Yule's φ measure of association), although the rate of positive associations was even higher (47%) across all continental U.S. rare taxa (Hernández-Yáñez et al 2016). In contrast, <0.1% of associations between threats were significantly negative, a trend mirrored by continental U.S. taxa as a whole.…”
Section: Threat Assessment For Critically Imperiled and Imperiled Usmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First level threats affected crop wild relatives differently than rare U.S. plants as a whole. Across crop wild relatives, the most common threat was Natural System Modifications, affecting 44% of taxa, while across all U.S. species this threat was the fifth most common, affecting 29% of taxa (Hernández-Yáñez et al 2016 Threats from fire and fire suppression were largely due to the third level threat, Suppression in fire frequency/intensity (20%) and less to Increase in fire frequency/intensity (4%) or Unspecified changes in fire frequency/intensity (4%). The distribution of second level threats across crop wild relatives suggests that many taxa are affected by direct land usurpation (e.g., urbanization and inundation by dams) as well as factors that alter competitive and consumerresource dynamics (e.g., invasive species and fire suppression).…”
Section: Threat Assessment For Critically Imperiled and Imperiled Usmentioning
confidence: 99%