1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-9270.1975.tb00913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach to the investigation of scattered wreck sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Post‐depositional processes at the wreck‐sites acted as an ‘extracting filter’, discriminating between light objects such as hull timbers, rigging, and buoyant cargo which disintegrated or drifted ashore to be salvaged, and heavy metallic artefacts which were buried in the local sand. The buried artefacts were protected from destruction and salvage, survived and accumulated as assemblages of intact metal artefacts (Frost, 1962; Muckelroy, 1975; Ward et al , 1999a; Ward et al , 1999b).…”
Section: Site Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post‐depositional processes at the wreck‐sites acted as an ‘extracting filter’, discriminating between light objects such as hull timbers, rigging, and buoyant cargo which disintegrated or drifted ashore to be salvaged, and heavy metallic artefacts which were buried in the local sand. The buried artefacts were protected from destruction and salvage, survived and accumulated as assemblages of intact metal artefacts (Frost, 1962; Muckelroy, 1975; Ward et al , 1999a; Ward et al , 1999b).…”
Section: Site Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for erroneous identification is greatly increased in the study of scattered wrecks [21,23], where the vessel is no longer intact and its characteristics must be inferred from the analysis of the remaining pieces of the vessel. Likewise, the potential for correcting erroneous identifications is much more limited, since one can rarely hope to discover an associated name on the vessel or other evidence that would conclusively undermine an existing identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vessels caught in a storm drifted ashore and wrecked in the surf‐zone, and heavy objects were buried in the sand. Such buried artefacts were protected from destruction and salvage, and survived as intact assemblages (Frost, 1962; Muckelroy, 1975; Ward et al. , 1999; Galili et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vessels caught in a storm drifted ashore and wrecked in the surf-zone, and heavy objects were buried in the sand. Such buried artefacts were protected from destruction and salvage, and survived as intact assemblages (Frost, 1962;Muckelroy, 1975;Ward et al, 1999;Galili et al, 2002a). In the last 50 years changing coastal sedimentation patterns, caused by natural processes combined with human activities (sand quarrying and the construction of marine structures), have resulted in shortage of sand and exposure of archaeological sites on the shallow sea-bottom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%