1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach to noise reduction in chaotic hydrological time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, recent studies (e.g. Sivakumar et al, 1999b;Sivakumar, 2000) reveal that, while small levels of noise influence significantly the accuracy of prediction estimates, the correlation dimension estimates are not influenced significantly (i.e. overestimated) even when noise levels are high.…”
Section: Analyses Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, recent studies (e.g. Sivakumar et al, 1999b;Sivakumar, 2000) reveal that, while small levels of noise influence significantly the accuracy of prediction estimates, the correlation dimension estimates are not influenced significantly (i.e. overestimated) even when noise levels are high.…”
Section: Analyses Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Havstad and Ehlers, 1989;Schreiber and Kantz, 1996;Sivakumar et al, 1999b). It is important to note, however, that there could also be other problems, as serious as or even more serious than the above, that might not have received the necessary attention because of their association with a particular field.…”
Section: Analyses Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is often helpful, and necessary, to use as many ways as possible to be more confident of the scaling region identification and correlation exponent estimation. Further details on the effects of noise on the correlation dimension estimate, in particular reference to hydrologic data (rainfall), are presented in, for example, Sivakumar et al (1999b), and the interested reader is directed to such. In view of the above, we use not only the local slope versus Log r for identification and estimation (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real time series is always expected to be contaminated by some level of noise. It is, however, shown by Sivakumar et al (1999c) that the presence of noise significantly affects the prediction accuracy and the correlation dimension estimates are not influenced even for high noise levels. The authors argue that the correlation dimension estimation could be attempted for preliminary investigation of character of chaos in the hydrological data.…”
Section: Time Series Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%