2003
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0303-247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach to modeling, capturing, and disseminating proteomics experimental data

Abstract: Both the generation and the analysis of proteome data are becoming increasingly widespread, and the field of proteomics is moving incrementally toward high-throughput approaches. Techniques are also increasing in complexity as the relevant technologies evolve. A standard representation of both the methods used and the data generated in proteomics experiments, analogous to that of the MIAME (minimum information about a microarray experiment) guidelines for transcriptomics, and the associated MAGE (microarray ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proposal for a standard representation of both, the methods used and the data generated in proteomics experiments was presented recently (Taylor et al, 2003;Garwood et al, 2004a). It is analogous to that of the minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) guidelines for ''transcriptomics'' and the associated microarray gene expression (MAGE) object model including a extensible mark-up language (XML) implementation.…”
Section: The Need For a Common Standard…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposal for a standard representation of both, the methods used and the data generated in proteomics experiments was presented recently (Taylor et al, 2003;Garwood et al, 2004a). It is analogous to that of the minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) guidelines for ''transcriptomics'' and the associated microarray gene expression (MAGE) object model including a extensible mark-up language (XML) implementation.…”
Section: The Need For a Common Standard…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed two general criteria for proteomics data storage systems: sufficiency and natural organization [23]. Taylor et al developed an advanced infrastructure for capture, storage, and dissemination strategies for proteomics data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tools [20,21,23,24] such as PEDRo [25], PRIDE (www.ebi.ac.uk/pride), ProteinScape [26], HSC-2DPAGE [27] provide web interfaces to enable data retrieval and dissemination [28]. ProteinScape [26] is able to handle MS-based protein identification data [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the experience gained from the large-scale genomics projects, there is widespread recognition that the proteomics field needs to invest early on in significant multi-laboratory efforts devoted to improving data quality [1], to making cross-laboratory and cross-platform data comparisons [2], and to developing data standards [3]. One such effort is the Plasma Proteomics Initiative, one of the first endeavors of the Human Proteome Organization Plasma Proteome Project (HUPO PPP) [4], which also includes liver and brain initiatives [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these issues is to encourage open and direct comparisons of methods and technologies, using sample(s) made commonly available to many laboratories [3][4][5] and facilitating the development of a central repository for results with unified data standards. With such a centralized and unified data system in place, a much greater impact of proteomic efforts will be realized, such as more effective mining of results, development of better data analysis tools, more confident protein identifications, and a deeper understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses of various technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%