2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2018.8437808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Approach to Incremental Redundancy over Erasure Channels

Abstract: As sensing and instrumentation play an increasingly important role in systems controlled over wired and wireless networks, the need to better understand delay-sensitive communication becomes a prime issue. Along these lines, this article studies the operation of data links that employ incremental redundancy as a practical means to protect information from the effects of unreliable channels. Specifically, this work extends a powerful methodology termed sequential differential optimization to choose near-optimal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, variations of SDO were developed to improve the Gaussian model accuracy, cf. [11], [12], and SDO was applied to systems that employ incremental redundancy and hybrid automatic repeat request [13] and to the binary erasure channel [14], [15]. However, in this paper, we will show that the Gaussian model is still imprecise for small values of n. Additionally, the existing SDO procedure did not consider the gap constraint of decoding times and is only suitable for VLSF codes with sparse decoding times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Later, variations of SDO were developed to improve the Gaussian model accuracy, cf. [11], [12], and SDO was applied to systems that employ incremental redundancy and hybrid automatic repeat request [13] and to the binary erasure channel [14], [15]. However, in this paper, we will show that the Gaussian model is still imprecise for small values of n. Additionally, the existing SDO procedure did not consider the gap constraint of decoding times and is only suitable for VLSF codes with sparse decoding times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Later, variations of SDO were developed to improve the Gaussian model accuracy [13], [14]. The SDO algorithm is used to optimize systems that employ incremental redundancy and hybrid automatic repeat request (ARQ) [15], and to code for the binary erasure channel [16], [17]. However, in this paper, we show that the Gaussian model is still imprecise for small values of n. Additionally, the existing SDO procedure fails to consider the inherent gap constraint that two decoding times must be separated by at least one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a specified maximum number of feedback transmissions and a maximum probability that the decoder fails to produce a positive acknowledgement (ACK) even when all possible incremental redundancy has been received, SDO finds the transmission lengths that minimize average blocklength. SDO requires a known probability distribution on the probability of ACK at each cumulative blocklength, but works equally well for the variety of distributions that arise from different variable-length codes operating on different channels [15]- [17]. The original formulation of SDO minimizes the average blocklength for a fixed maximum number of feedback transmissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%