1990
DOI: 10.1525/maq.1990.4.4.02a00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Approach for Using Qualitative Methods in Primary Prevention Research

Abstract: In this article we delineate a systematic approachfor incorporating qualitative methods in research on primary prevention. Using examples from our studies of both smoking and cessation processes, we describe our procedure in four consecutive stages: (]) interviews and fieldnotes, (2) case studies or life histories, (3) discourse and content analyses to identify emergent issues and themes which are subsequently standardized as codes, and (4) the interpretation of sociocultural patterns and idioms of bodily expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
208
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a methodology of "Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison" outlined by Willms et al (1992) and rooted in grounded theory (i.e., theory derived from data and then illustrated by characteristic examples of data) (Glaser and Strauss, 1967), individual interview and focus group audiotapes were analyzed as follows. The first author and two research staff members (all bilingual and of Mexican heritage) reviewed the audiotapes and independently conducted a content analysis to condense the data into analyzable units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a methodology of "Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison" outlined by Willms et al (1992) and rooted in grounded theory (i.e., theory derived from data and then illustrated by characteristic examples of data) (Glaser and Strauss, 1967), individual interview and focus group audiotapes were analyzed as follows. The first author and two research staff members (all bilingual and of Mexican heritage) reviewed the audiotapes and independently conducted a content analysis to condense the data into analyzable units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provisional categories of emergent themes were developed to facilitate further coding. The results of the content analysis produced by each reviewer were discussed and through constant comparison, different categories were condensed further into broad summary themes (Willms, Best, and Taylor, 1992). Finally, the relationships among the categories and broad themes were considered for their utility in operationalizing salient domains across stakeholder individual interviews, focus groups, and field notes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46] Setting All focus group participants were recruited from a large, urban community health center in a Mid-Western City.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46] Participants Study staff approached individuals in the health center's main lobby to ask about participation. All individuals (primary care patients and visitors) 50 years who self-identified as African American and were without obvious mental or cognitive impairment were considered eligible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transcripts reflected the content of the interviews verbatim, thereby allowing reviewers to code the content in full. Based within the methodology of "Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison" as outlined by Willms et al (1990), the interview transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory analytic approach (Glaser and Strauss, 1967).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%