2017
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2017.2695888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Approach for Cross-Source Point Cloud Registration by Preserving Macro and Micro Structures

Abstract: Abstract-We propose a systematic approach for registering cross-source point clouds. The compelling need for cross-source point cloud registration is motivated by the rapid development of a variety of 3D sensing techniques, but many existing registration methods face critical challenges as a result of the large variations in cross-source point clouds. This paper therefore illustrates a novel registration method which successfully aligns two crosssource point clouds in the presence of significant missing data, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method to find the matching and compute the transformation can be done with two main paradigms: transforming the image data in localizations with potential additional features using point-based registration ( [89,91] for the AutoFINDER part of ec-clem) or shape-based registration, potentially with intensity-based machine learning approaches [99]. Note that a plethora of variants exists for point-cloud registration, some of them sounding particularly promising for feature-based multimodal registration [100]. Interesting approaches mixed both feature-based and full registration by restraining the learning data set to registered features [101].…”
Section: Correlation Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method to find the matching and compute the transformation can be done with two main paradigms: transforming the image data in localizations with potential additional features using point-based registration ( [89,91] for the AutoFINDER part of ec-clem) or shape-based registration, potentially with intensity-based machine learning approaches [99]. Note that a plethora of variants exists for point-cloud registration, some of them sounding particularly promising for feature-based multimodal registration [100]. Interesting approaches mixed both feature-based and full registration by restraining the learning data set to registered features [101].…”
Section: Correlation Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to effectively capture the spatial context information during the action process, a graph structure is used to represent the relationship between mid-level patches [53,54]. Firstly, all mid-level patches are constructed into an undirected action graph G = (V, E), where the node i ∈ V represents a mid-level patch, and the edge (i, j) ∈ E represents the relationship between two patches.…”
Section: The Graph Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, we introduce line 1 of Algorithm 1. Following [1], we use supervoxel segmentation method [8] to segment the point clouds and use the central points of these segments as the salient structures. Triplet point selections: Inspired by [9], we randomly select triangles satisfying wide baseline strategy and use the three nodes of these triangles as triplet points.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the comparison experiments are executed on an I5 CPU, 8GB memory computer. We select ICP [10], GO-ICP [11], Super-4PCS [9], CPD [12], JR-MPC [13] and CSGM [1] as the comparison methods. Most of the existed state-of-the-art registration methods are focus on same-source data and designed to solve SE(3) transformation.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation