2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20061636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Analysis of Narrowband IoT Quality of Service

Abstract: Narrowband-IoT (NB-IoT) is part of a novel group of access technologies referred to as Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs), which provide energy-efficient and long-range network access to IoT devices. Although NB-IoT Release 13 has been deployed by Mobile Network Operators (MNO), detailed Quality of Service (QoS) evaluations in public networks are still rare. In this paper, systematic physical layer measurements are conducted, and the application layer performance is verified. Special consideration is given … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to regional variations of NB-IoT, Sigfox or LoRaWAN coverage, inadequate quality of service, local interference from building stock or vegetation, as well as effects of ambient conditions (e.g., variations in temperature) might lead to an increase in energy consumption or prohibit reliable operation. To that effect, numerous publications [ 29 , 38 , 39 ] discuss the specific limits of the compared technologies. Further, results in [ 13 ] or [ 27 ] confirm the influence of on-site conditions on transmission performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to regional variations of NB-IoT, Sigfox or LoRaWAN coverage, inadequate quality of service, local interference from building stock or vegetation, as well as effects of ambient conditions (e.g., variations in temperature) might lead to an increase in energy consumption or prohibit reliable operation. To that effect, numerous publications [ 29 , 38 , 39 ] discuss the specific limits of the compared technologies. Further, results in [ 13 ] or [ 27 ] confirm the influence of on-site conditions on transmission performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each technology offers advantages and limitations, either based on operational constraints or technological and contractual requirements [ 13 , 27 ], which have to meet the standards for the data required by the applied detection algorithms. The expected performance and limitations of NB-IoT [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], Sigfox [ 32 ] and LoRaWAN [ 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] have been analyzed and tested extensively. In addition to energy consumption, the communication technologies vary regarding transmission rates (e.g., 100–600 bps for Sigfox versus 0.24–37.5 kbps for LoRaWAN), hourly or daily data transmission limits due to contractual terms or fair access policies in shared networks and expected transmission success or data loss rates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, too, the data is transmitted in JSON format. Further information on the exact key data of the sensors can be found in the publications by Stege et al [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Emergency Button and Temperature/humidity Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors [47] systematically measure the physical layer as well as verify application layer performance. Particular attention is paid to the impact of radio parameters on the application layer QoS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%