2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7md00381a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic analysis of atomic protein–ligand interactions in the PDB

Abstract: We compiled a list of 11 016 unique structures of small-molecule ligands bound to proteins representing 750 873 protein–ligand atomic interactions, and analyzed the frequency, geometry and the impact of each interaction type. The most frequent ligand–protein atom pairs can be clustered into seven interaction types.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
281
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
6
281
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This interaction may also contribute to improved PBD-binding since contacts involving leucine residues are among the most frequent hydrophobic interactions observed in protein-ligand complexes. 32 …”
Section: X-ray Co-crystal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interaction may also contribute to improved PBD-binding since contacts involving leucine residues are among the most frequent hydrophobic interactions observed in protein-ligand complexes. 32 …”
Section: X-ray Co-crystal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] However,this effect is applied to synthetic molecular recognition [7] and is also common in biological assemblies. [8] Herein, we report an ew molecular tube-based ternary complex with as trong positive cooperativity (a = 580). This is achieved by "waking up" relatively weak CÀH···O hydrogen bonds between two molecular tubes in the complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thec omplex was further applied to construct ar obust [2+ +2] cyclic complex, demonstrating its potential as ab inding motif for the construction of large supramolecular architectures.T he present research showcases that relatively weak non-covalent interactions may result in strong positive cooperativity,w hich is often the feature of biological assemblies. [8,20]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the glucose molecules substituted at the 4 and 6 positions, 85/83 and 92/93 % of the α/β variants have one or more HBs with the bridging water molecules. On average, α/β‐glucose and α/β‐galactose molecules have 1.8/1.8 and 2.5/1.6 HBs with the bridging water molecules, whereas an average over all PDB ligands is 0.4 HB . These numbers increase for the substituted molecules to 3.2/3.4 for α/β‐glucose substituted on the 4 position and 4.1/2.9 for α/β‐glucose substituted on the 6 position.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On average, a/b-glucose and a/bgalactose molecules have 1.8/1.8 and 2.5/1.6 HBs with the bridging water molecules, whereas an average over all PDB ligands is 0.4 HB. [45] These numbersi ncreasef or the substituted molecules to 3.2/3.4 for a/b-glucose substituted on the 4p osition and 4.1/2.9 for a/b-glucose substituted on the 6p osition. For ar esolution 2 ,a ll the sugar molecules tend to have more HBs with the water:o na verage, a/b-glucose and a/bgalactose molecules have 2.3/2.2 and 2.9/1.8 HBs with the bridging water molecules.…”
Section: Pdb-wide Analysis Of Hydrogen Bondsatthe Interface Of Proteimentioning
confidence: 95%