2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2216931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A system to track skin dose for neuro-interventional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Abstract: The skin-dose tracking system (DTS) provides a color-coded illustration of the cumulative skin-dose distribution on a closely-matching 3D graphic of the patient during fluoroscopic interventions in real-time for immediate feedback to the interventionist. The skin-dose tracking utility of DTS has been extended to include cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of neurointerventions. While the DTS was developed to track the entrance skin dose including backscatter, a significant part of the dose in CBCT is contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly because of overresponse characteristics owing to the relatively high effective atomic numbers of constituent materials (aluminum oxide doped with carbon, Al2O3:C) in diagnostic energy ranges [8,9]. A significant problem occurs for the use of OSLD with cone-beam CT [14], as the absorbed doses can be contributed by various overlapping projections, including the primary radiation of entrance/exit incidences and scattering from many rays [15]. Each incidence ray might possess different mean energies owing to the different degrees of beam hardening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because of overresponse characteristics owing to the relatively high effective atomic numbers of constituent materials (aluminum oxide doped with carbon, Al2O3:C) in diagnostic energy ranges [8,9]. A significant problem occurs for the use of OSLD with cone-beam CT [14], as the absorbed doses can be contributed by various overlapping projections, including the primary radiation of entrance/exit incidences and scattering from many rays [15]. Each incidence ray might possess different mean energies owing to the different degrees of beam hardening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,18,19 However, a single backscatter factor does not describe the scatter distribution sufficiently well as scatter may extend beyond the collimated area. 20 In addition, scatter decreases toward the border of the irradiated area. 21 Therefore, studies propose the expansion of scalar backscatter factors to more generic precomputed two-dimensional (2D) point spread functions (PSF) 21,22 or three-dimensional (3D) dose point kernels (DPK).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backscatter factors have been estimated using both empiric and Monte Carlo (MC) methods and are usually modeled as a scalar factor with respect to the central x‐ray beam . However, a single backscatter factor does not describe the scatter distribution sufficiently well as scatter may extend beyond the collimated area . In addition, scatter decreases toward the border of the irradiated area .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 However, the backscatter distribution is not uniform across the entire field, but decreases towards the edge of the field and extends beyond the collimation. 5 Moreover a single backscatter factor is not sufficient to describe the backscatter variation across the entire field, when the primary dose distribution is not uniform. X-ray field shaping devices like region of interest (ROI) beam attenuators and compensation filters modify the photon fluence in the field of view by attenuating the primary × rays outside the region of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%