2019
DOI: 10.2172/1571258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A System-Level Framework For Fatigue Life Prediction of PWR Pressurizer-Surge-Line Nozzle under Design-Basis Loading Cycles. A complete tensile test based material properties database and preliminary results on 3D weld process modeling, thermal-mechanical stress analysis and environmental fatigue testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that all the yield and hardening parameters are based on 0.05% offset-strain rather than the conventional 0.2% offset-strain yield limit. This better captures the plasticity region of a component [8]. Figure 2.6 shows the comparison of expansion coefficients for different material used in the model.…”
Section: Finite Element Model For Thermal-mechanical Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that all the yield and hardening parameters are based on 0.05% offset-strain rather than the conventional 0.2% offset-strain yield limit. This better captures the plasticity region of a component [8]. Figure 2.6 shows the comparison of expansion coefficients for different material used in the model.…”
Section: Finite Element Model For Thermal-mechanical Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2.6 shows the comparison of expansion coefficients for different material used in the model. Note that all material properties and the expansion coefficients used in the FE models are directly based on our earlier tensile tests [8], which improve accuracy in the FE model for future experimental validation. We assume the manufacturing related residual stresses were incorporated in the FE model by using the material properties directly estimated based on the tensile test data of associated weld metals.…”
Section: Finite Element Model For Thermal-mechanical Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3.8 shows an example of laboratory test-based data that can be used for DT model development. This figure shows the fatigue cycle versus observed cyclic strain under thermal-mechanical fatigue loading [28]. Although the laboratory data presented here were obtained using a truncated cyclic period (of approximately 25 seconds), actual reactor loading cycles could vary from days to months or even more than a year (e.g.…”
Section: Heterogenous Source and Timescale Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3. 8 Example of laboratory test-based measured cycle versus observed strain under fatigue loading, with cyclic period of 25 seconds [28]. The time scale of measurements can be significantly different from the time scale for ultrasound sensor measurements shown in Figure 3.5.…”
Section: Heterogenous Source and Timescale Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%