We study translational regulation by a 5' UTR sequence encoding the binding site of an RNA-binding protein (RBP), using a reporter assay and SHAPE-seq, in bacteria. We tested constructs containing a single hairpin, based on the binding sites of the coat RBPs of bacteriophages MS2, PP7, GA, and Qβ, positioned in the 5' UTR. With specifically-bound RBP present, either weak repression or up-regulation is observed, depending on the binding site.SHAPE-seq data for a representative construct exhibiting up-regulation indicate a partiallyfolded hairpin and a hypo-modified upstream flanking region, which we attribute to an intermediate structure that apparently blocks translation. RBP binding stabilizes the fully-folded hairpin state and thus facilitates translation. This indicates that the up-regulating constructs are RBP-sensing riboswitches. This finding is further supported by lengthening the binding-site stem, which in turn destabilizes the translationally-inactive state. Finally, the combination of two binding sites, positioned in the 5' UTR and N-terminus of the same transcript can yield a cooperative regulatory response. Together, we show that the interaction of an RBP with its RNA target facilitates structural changes in the RNA, which is reflected by a controllable range of binding affinities and dose response behavior. This implies that RNA-RBP interactions can provide a platform for constructing gene regulatory networks that are based on translational, rather than transcriptional, regulation.
KeywordsRiboswitch, RNA-binding protein, RBP-RNA interactions, phage coat proteins, MS2, PP7, translational repression, hairpin, translation stimulation..
CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under aThe copyright holder for this preprint (which was not . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/174888 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Aug. 10, 2017; 3 One of the main goals of synthetic biology is the construction of complex gene regulatory networks. The majority of engineered regulatory networks have been based on transcriptional regulation, with only a few examples based on post-transcriptional regulation (Win and Smolke, 2008;Green et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2011; Wroblewska et al., 2015). RNA-based regulatory components have many advantages. Several RNA components have been shown to be functional in multiple organisms (Harvey et al., 2002; Suess et al., 2003; Desai and Gallivan, 2004; Buxbaum et al., 2015). RNA can respond rapidly to stimuli, enabling a faster regulatory response than that possible at the transcriptional level (Hentze et al., 1987; St Johnston, 2005;Saito et al., 2010;Lewis et al., 2017). The response range of RNA components can be very wide (Green et al., 2014). RNA molecules form a variety of stable secondary and tertiary structures, which support diverse functions. Moreover, a single RNA molecule may contain multiple functional structures, which enables modularity. For example, distinct sequence domains within a molecule (Lewis et al...